• PROGRAM
  • REGISTRATION
  • SPONSORSHIP
  • LOCATION

Overview of Technical Sessions

The Sixth International Marine Debris Conference (6IMDC) will be held in San Diego, California, USA. The event takes place March 12-16, 2018. With over 600 expected participants, the 6IMDC is an opportunity to energize international coordination efforts within the marine debris community.

With a variety of tracks, themes, and session types, the 6IMDC will promote new partnerships, further raise public awareness and support, and inspire new actions that will take us closer to the world free from the impacts of marine debris.

We have identified over 75 sessions within ten track areas and welcome abstract submissions for sessions in the following areas. You can submit to any of the technical sessions listed. Please click on the below links to view the sessions under each track. You will identify which technical session is most appropriate for your abstract/poster submission on Step 13 of the submission process below.

Monitoring and Citizen Science
Research and Microplastics and Microfibers
Prevention
Private Sector Collaboration, Technology, and Innovation
Education and Communication
Implementing Effective Law, Regulations, and Policy
Removal
Single-Use Product Policies, Regulations and Laws
Derelict Fishing Gear
Innovative Case Studies from Around the World

Abstract Submission Information

The abstract submission box is limited to a 1850 characters (~250 words) maximum. There is a 10 author limit on the abstract submission form. You have an option to attach a file if you have an applicable document tied to the abstract submission.  Accepted file types include pdf, doc, docx, odt, rtf.

Abstract Submission Form

Step 1 of 14

7%
  • Contact Information

  • Please include country code with phone number.
  • Abstract Information

  • Accepted file types: pdf, doc, docx, odt, rtf, Max. file size: 128 MB.
    If applicable, please upload the associated paper with the abstract
  • First Author

  • Second Author

  • Third Author

  • Fourth Author

  • Fifth Author

  • Sixth Author

  • Seventh Author

  • Eighth Author

  • Ninth Author

  • Tenth Author

  • Session Information

    Please select ONLY ONE session preference.

    French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER), Francois Galgani

    Center for Environment, Fisheries, and Aquatic Science (CEFAS) Thomas Maes

     

    This session is dedicated to scientists, stakeholders, institutions and managers to present and discuss their experience on large scale assessment of marine litter and propose solutions for a simple and efficient monitoring of marine litter in the world oceans.

     

    A global monitoring plan for marine litter could be an important component to provide a harmonized organizational framework for the collection of comparable monitoring data on marine litter from different regions. This will allow scientists to identify changes in marine litter concentrations over time, as well as identifying regional and global environmental transport mechanisms. It will also provide a tool to better assess the effectiveness of measures and actions taken within the frameworks of wider initiatives and policies, actions plans and global agreements.

     

    Such a process will need various steps before a complete implementation. Data and information collection, including capacity-enhancement activities and the development of regional monitoring reports, will have to be organized, possibly under the responsibility of contracting parties or regional organizations of several UN Regions. This will need to be followed up by a group to better coordinate the implementation of the global monitoring plan and the consideration of a global monitoring report. Large scale monitoring has been already addressed nationally or internationally within different initiatives, processes or frameworks, such a MSFD, G7 or actions from large NGOs. These will need more coordination, support and strategy to optimize and rationalize the initiative.

     

    To address this, to fill the knowledge gaps and propose a simple strategy for an harmonized monitoring the global ocean, this IMDC session will discuss and define a strategy for information gathering, including capacity building and establishment of strategic partnerships in order to fill the identified data gaps.


    European Commission Joint Research Centre Directorate D Sustainable Resources, Georg Hanke

    CNR-ISMAR, Institute of Marine Science, Italy, Stefao Aliani

     

    This session is focused on quantification of floating macro litter/debris at sea through development of harmonized approaches.

     

    Floating Marine Macro Litter (debris) FMML has been spotted in all marine areas on the planet, sometimes with remarkable abundances. Its presence is posing an increasing thread to the marine environment and human activities. FMML has also direct negative impact on wildlife such as seabirds, fish, turtles and marine mammals through ingestion or entanglement. Through complex degradation processes floating macro litter is the source for secondary microparticles in the marine environment. Floating litter can end up on the sea shores, thus affecting tourism and animals on beaches.

     

    The availability of georeferenced, detailed data of appropriate quality is of basic importance for tackling the marine litter problem, also because the proper assessment of the quantities of Litter and the relative distribution at sea provide the exposure information for risk assessments.

    At present, information mainly rely on human visual sightings, but data from different groups or different geographic regions are often not comparable because a full harmonization of approaches is still lacking. Therefore, the use of agreed or comparable protocols, item lists and tools is the way forward towards the acquisition of data which can be used across regions for the deriving trends of litter pollution.

     

    This session will present and discuss the current state of macrolitter monitoring to pave the way towards international agreed protocols. It will be a platform for the presentation of results from monitoring at different spatial scales and from different marine areas. It will thus provide information about levels and gradients of pollution and will propose examples of the currently-applied methodologies.


    Museum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Francoise Claro

    Siena University, Christina Fossi, CSIRO Denise Hardesty

     

    This session focuses on monitoring opportunities and challenges for major marine taxa from the view of using marine fauna as ecological indicators of ocean and ecosystem health.

     

    Monitoring the effects of marine litter in marine organisms is useful for the conservation of the marine environment as well as to understand the impact of marine litter on populations. Furthermore, it provides data to inform national or regional policies and can provide an important baseline for the establishment of new monitoring programmes.

     

    However the feasibility of monitoring may be subjected to constraints such as the appropriate methodology, logistics, sanitation, regulations, etc., all of which may hinder the development and implementation of a monitoring program.

     

    Because of their size and geographic distribution, and due to the preexistence of dedicated observation networks (stranding and rescue of marine mammals and turtles, fisheries observer campaigns etc.), several marine megafauna taxa are already used as ecological indicators of ecosystem health. Ingestion and entanglement are the most frequently observed types of interactions between anthropogenic debris and marine vertebrates. In addition to seabirds, sea turtles, are also good indicator species for monitoring the impact of litter ingestion, and there are several methods available for understanding the interactions between sea turtles and litter.

     

    In other cases, in particular cetaceans and sharks, research is ongoing or needed, in order to monitor and describe the direct (pathology, mortality) and indirect (physiological, ecotoxicological…) impact of interactions between these species and litter.

     

    The technical session objectives are to: share lessons learned from existing monitoring initiatives at national and regional scales; share the results of recent research (new methods, evaluation of the exposure to litter, occurrence and effects of micro- and nano-scale plastics); discuss methods, indicators and technical tools (such as training), standardization and possible cooperation; identify knowledge gaps and tools required to understand the impact of anthropogenic debris on major marine taxa, identify practical recommendations to fulfil these gaps.


    NOAA Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary, Kate Bimrose

    NOAA Marine Debris Program, Caitlin Wessel

     

    This session will focus on real life application of marine debris monitoring data to inform management and policy, which will be of interest to a wide audience including resource managers, scientists, policy makers, and the public.

     

    Marine debris is a global problem that impacts marine life, damages habitat, impedes navigation, impacts our economy, and is a risk to human health and safety. In order to address these issues we need to understand the sources, movement, and impact of debris along our coasts and in our marine environment. Development of marine debris monitoring programs seek to gain this understanding through the collection of debris data. These data can answer important research questions, such as what/where are marine debris source(s), are there depositional patterns, and what are the most common or most damaging types of marine debris. Answering such questions can then inform the development of management and policy strategies that address the problem of marine debris on a local, regional, and national/international scale.

     

    Real life application of marine debris data is the focus of this session and should emphasize how sound science informs the sources, threats, and solutions surrounding the global problem of marine debris. Presentations should highlight findings from the analysis of marine debris monitoring program data, for example, interpreting data to demonstrate the behavior, abundance, movement and impacts related to marine debris. Presentations may demonstrate how data findings lead to the development of new management or policy strategies for agencies, campaigns, businesses, industry, and others.

     

    Additionally, presentations may exhibit how monitoring program data can evaluate the effectiveness of existing marine debris related strategies, such as plastic bag bans, by tracking the presence of plastic bags within our oceans and coastlines overtime. Developing policies and management procedures is arguably one of the most effective means for truly reducing marine debris in our environment. Learning about how data leads to the development of new, or restructuring of existing, strategies highlights the importance of monitoring programs and will likely guide marine debris reduction and prevention strategies in order to protect the future of our marine resources.


    University of Washington, Hillary K Burgess

    NOAA Marine Debris Program, Sherry Lippiatt

     

    This session will focus on best practices in citizen science for marine debris monitoring.

     

    With many potential benefits, from an engaged and informed community of participants, to generation of high quality high resolution data at scales that would otherwise be impossible, citizen science is a growing field that has applications to coastal and marine research and monitoring. How do we ensure that these benefits are realized within the increasing number of citizen science projects devoted to marine debris? This symposium will explore best practices and lessons-learned for citizen science, in particular marine debris citizen science, to achieve project goals that range from the personal (education, outreach) to the scientific (data and science generation that can inform solutions to environmental problems). Presentations in this session should draw from the experience of existing citizen science practitioners and researchers to make recommendations for program development and management. Topics to be considered include strategies for: participant recruitment, retention and communication; ensuring and measuring data quality; developing protocols and materials that facilitate data quality and learning; promoting and measuring learning outcomes; and data management and delivery.


    Let's Do It Foundation, John Rizzo

     

    This session focuses on the fight against the population's "trash blindness" can be fought through massive use of data -- more data, more accurate data, more timely data, more visualized data -- which is most effective if collected and analyzed through citizen science, from people to people, and openly shared.

     

    There is the potential interface with the Let's Do It Foundation open trash database platform. People could go into the field, enter data into the database, and then access the database and exchange data, and give feedback. Although many organizations have been collecting trash data for a long time, it is still not enough to tackle the problem. Most people still have "trash blindness" - they do not see the trash on the beach or on the street, and still do not believe or take any interest in the trash statistics.

     

    There are three issues behind "trash blindness":

    1) Data is collected and analyzed in too scientific way. Data and analysis results are not translated into the language that a person from the street can understand. The gap between professionals and public is so significant that it starts to erode the trust about science.

    2) The significant lack of data is making the situation worse. If every fact can be disputed, even if people become interested in the information, they will soon be confused about what is right or wrong. People choose the easier way, they ignore every bit of the data.

    3) Trash data that is collected by various agencies and NGO's around the world is not easily shared or accessible to other groups. The bits and pieces of information do not create the full picture, what the world's trash situation truly is.

     

    There are also three ways to solve the problem:

    1) Citizen science. The trust will be gained when scientists work together with citizens. Let's Do It Foundation has demonstrated that people are more interested when they participate in the collection and analysis of the data. The results are also more understandable, because they are translated into the non-scientific language.

    2) Massive collection of the data with the help of public. Members of the general public are not always precise in describing data, but when the data is "crowd-sourced" on a large scale, the data is more accurate data and more up-to-date data. Empowering the citizens does miracles to the overall result. The consolidation of many different data sources also helps significantly.

    3) An open trash database platform that is available for any organization to use. The goal is to bring various sets of data together, opening it up, making it comparable and analyzable, and creating the tools that everyone can use.


    Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP), Shelly Moore

    California Ocean Protection Council, Holly Wyer

     

    This session will be informative for water quality managers, the regulated community, and NGOs who rely on debris monitoring to inform their policy positions; this session will cover monitoring methodologies that have been used to scientifically monitor for trash in the coastal environment, their challenges, and future opportunities to engage in trash monitoring.

     

    In California, the State Water Resources Control Board in 2015 passed a regulation (the “Trash Amendments”) prohibiting the discharge of trash from stormwater systems into streams, rivers, lakes, and ocean. This regulation requires municipalities to either install full trash capture devices within their storm drain systems to limit trash making its way into receiving waters, or to establish an equivalent program. An important component to measuring compliance is to accurately monitor trash in waterways. Most surveys of trash in California have been one-time events in various locations using different methodologies. Few regional surveys have been done that use similar methodologies and include training a wide variety of people and quality control measures.  One such study in Southern California, the Bight 13 Regional Trash and Debris Survey, was recently completed; however, methodologies used were largely leveraged off other programs (i.e. fish trawl, benthic infauna grabs, physical stream assessments) sampling designs and protocols. There is still a need to develop a suite of methodologies that can be used by a wide variety of stakeholders with different needs, management goals, and staffing capacities.

     

    Although the new regulations require monitoring for certain types of compliance scenarios, they do not prescribe a particular methodology for monitoring, which has created a need for the development of scientific methods to monitor trash, larger than 5 mm, in receiving waters. Currently, there are no agreed upon and recommended standardized methodologies allowing for spatial and temporal comparisons on both local and regional scales. As the State looks toward determining the effectiveness of the new trash regulations, they will need to have data that not only serves as a baseline, but also allows for the comparison of the amounts of trash on both spatial and temporal levels to determine if they are decreasing. Additionally, trash monitoring in the marine environment has been going on for some time, and the information collected as part of these coastal monitoring efforts would ideally be comparable to the monitoring efforts that are ongoing in the ocean.

     

    This session would discuss the work done to date on scientific methods to monitor for trash in coastal  California environments, including freshwater bodies that discharge to the ocean. This session would include information from those who have already been collecting trash data using a variety of traditional methods, and also those using cutting edge technologies, such as drones or fixed cameras. Scientific monitoring for trash in coastal waterways will provide us with a better picture of where trash discharge problems are originating on land, and lead us to a better understanding of where to focus efforts to prevent trash from entering our coastal environments. Coastal cities and towns throughout the world face similar challenges in limiting the amount of trash that reaches the local waterways from urban areas. Showing how California is addressing these challenges opens the conversation to a larger audience and provides a platform where ideas can be shared and investigated. 


     


    Keep America Beautiful, Cecile Carson

    California State University, P Wesley Schultz

     

    This session is focused on behavior scientists, researchers, community leaders, NGOs. local government, and general public interested in learning more about why people litter and how to address.  

     

    Like many social problems, litter and marine debris is caused by human behavior.  Whether intentional or accidental, litter begins with the individual.  Given the social, economic, and environmental problems that result from litter, numerous interventions have been developed, implemented, and evaluated.  Yet despite these efforts, litter continues to be a problem.    In an effort to go beyond the typical self‐report measures used to study littering behavior, our research includes observations of individuals in a diverse sample of public locations. With regard to general littering, our statistical analyses revealed several important predictors. In addition to our systematic observations of disposal behaviors, Keep America Beautiful randomly selected locations where we conducted intercept interviews with the observed disposers. The goal was to obtain a small, representative sample of individuals and to link the responses from our intercept interview to the observed disposal behaviors. At each of the selected intercept locations, individuals who had been observed disposing (either properly or improperly) were approached to take part in a face‐to‐face survey. A combined set of strategies is necessary to address the issues to end littering and improve recycling. For over 40 years, Keep America Beautiful has used a Behavioral Methodology to identify littering behaviors and implement and evaluate strategies that change littering behaviors. A Behavioral Advisory Council consisting of academic and cultural experts began a refresh and relaunch of the original model. During this session, researchers and in-field practitioners will share current research to address the behaviors and strategies and methods to encourage proper disposal and reduce waste. Topics of discussion will include but not be limited to: community appearance and value of consistent and ongoing community clean‐up activities convenience to containers - clean‐up efforts in the absence of infrastructure  changes are likely to produce effects that are short‐lived; role for awareness and motivation campaigns - Ad Council, local messaging and signages using research from the I Want to Be campaign targeting recycling and plastic recycling specifically; review of 2016 recycling attitudes and behavior survey to determine the value individuals place on recycling and convenience


    Utrecht University, Erik van Sebille  

    Sea Education Association, Kara Lavendar Law

     

    This session focuses on how ocean waves and ocean currents move around the world. It also looks how how does this transport impact the fate and transport of marine debris in the ocean.  

     

    After plastic debris enters the ocean, its distribution is to a large extent determined by the ocean circulation; in particular waves and currents. Knowing how and where marine debris is transported by the ocean is key to understanding its fate and impact on marine ecosystems. Oceanographic phenomena that impact the transport and dispersion of marine debris occur on a large range of scales, from thousands of kilometers for the Ekman convergence in the subtropical gyres to a few centimeters for the Stokes drift by individual surface waves. The way that these different phenomena affect the dispersion of marine debris, and how this leads to the emergence of patchy accumulation regions and ‘hotspots’, is a major knowledge gap. In this session, we invite presentations on advances in the theory and modelling, possibly supported by observations, of marine debris of all sizes and materials. Topics include but are not limited to: -The stirring of buoyant debris due to turbulence, in particular in the mixed layer. -The transport of plastic in coastal seas, from the surf zone to the open ocean. -The effects of Stokes drift, Langmuir circulation, and other (nonlinear) wind effects on the transport of debris. -The effects of fragmentation, degradation, bio aggregation and biofouling on the evolution of the buoyancy of debris particles. -The movement and transport of debris in the water column and/or on the sea floor. -Development of and comparison between tools and software to simulate the dispersion of debris.


    5 Gyres Institute, Marcus Eriksen  

    UC Riverside, Win Cowger  

     

    This session looks at merging the many datasets of plastic debris on land and sea is a monumental challenge, doing so allows richer questions about source, sink, distribution and trends. This session will appeal to an audience interested in citizen science, as well as modelers of distribution patterns of debris on land and sea.  

     

    In this session will bring together marine debris practitioners to discuss their data collection process and lessons learned to improve comparability and utility on regional and international scales. We will focus on new advances and data synchronization. Here we aim to bring together the many data sets on land and sea that document plastic pollution. Globally the public, private, nonprofit and education sectors overlap in their efforts to document observations of plastic pollution, from nano to macro, in marine environments and on land, using varied methods. At sea we use nets, filtered pumps, and sea surface or seafloor visual observations. On land, surveys of beaches, roads, streams, as well as waste characterizations of litter conducted by municipalities, create rich data sets. There are many organizations, universities and government agencies, like NOAA, The Great Nurdle Hunt, SEA Education, Living Lands and Waters, SCCWRP, EOA, and Keep America Beautiful that have developed litter surveys. The Ocean Conservancy, Litterati, and Marine Debris Tracker have created mobile apps to engage the public in data collection. Many environmental NGOs, like Surfrider, Coastkeeper and 5 Gyres, have created their own data sets. The sum of these efforts is tremendous data, but there are challenges in content and comparability. How do we put it all together and make sense of it? To answer, a group from the Alfred-Wegener-Institute, created LITTERBASE, a pool of academic research on plastic pollution. We looked on land in 2016 to create the Better Alternatives Now List, which combined all land litter data from cities, mobile apps and beach cleanups for California only. In 2017 we are looking at the same for the entire U.S. These data show greater spatial resolution when lumped together, despite challenges to find common methods of categorizing types of products and packaging. In the sea we combined all known historical data about sea surface floating plastic with our most recent data from our 2013-2017 Travel Trawl citizen science program, reported in multiyear increments from 1980 to present. With greater consistency in data reporting (particle count (#/km2) and (weight kg/km2) we were able to produce a new global budget for floating debris. These two datasets are useful to show trends in debris accumulation, the natural systems that remove plastic from the sea, and the efficiency of mitigations on land. They also point to the need to continue engaging citizens in meaningful data collection that's comparable to other efforts. Future monitoring and mitigation require this engagement and consistency, but also a transparent discussion about how these data are utilized.


    Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Tracy Mincer  

    Utrech University, Linda Amaral-Zettler  

     

    This session looks at the plastic marine debris budget, news media and general public to determine best path forward.  

     

    Plastics have become the most common form of marine debris in the 60 years since they have entered the consumer arena and present a major and growing pollution concern. As materials of immense utility and durability, plastics represent a growth industry, with the current annual global production exceeding the total human biomass on our planet. Unfortunately, mismanagement of plastic waste is commonplace. It is estimated that nearly a third of single-use plastics escape the waste stream, creating the most common mechanism for the creation of plastic marine debris (PMD) in coastal regions. Once these predominantly buoyant plastic materials enter the ocean they can migrate large distances. For example, PMD from U. S. Northeastern Seaboard locations can migrate over 1000 kilometers to the interior of the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre (NASG), in less than 60 days. Surface net tow surveys by several research groups have quantified PMD in the NASG and North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Additionally, PMD has been documented to accumulate in all five of the world’s subtropical gyres, coastal areas, and remote areas including the Marianas Trench, Arctic and Antarctic sea ice, and pristine tropical islands. Indeed, it is now apparent that all ocean habitats have the potential to be impacted by PMD. However, the overall risk of microplastics (commonly described as 5 millimeters to 1 micrometer in size) and nanoplastics (less than 1 micrometer in size) on biota such as filter feeding species is underexplored. On average, it is estimated that 8 million metric tons of plastic escape the waste stream and enter our oceans annually. A recent model projected that over 150 million tons have been input to the oceans since plastic has entered the consumer arena. Paradoxically, the highest PMD estimate from recent global surface ocean surveys is only 250,000 metric tons– orders of magnitude lower than the amount of PMD projected, begging the question: “Where is all the plastic?” New technologies such as Raman Spectroscopy and micro-FTIR are allowing unprecedented detection of micro- and even nanoplastics. And methods separating micro- and nanoplastics from sediments and water column particulates such as ‘marine snow’ are yielding new insights into the distributions of PMD. Microbes have also been shown to interact with PMD, decreasing buoyancy, and possibly accelerating its degradation. These microbial consortia colonizing PMD can now be analyzed with powerful laser-scanning confocal visualization methods and combined with molecular probes, providing new insights into the spatial and temporal organization of biofilms on PMD. Computational models integrating datasets are yielding insight into the distribution of PMD below the ocean surface. The overarching theme and goal of this session is to discuss integrative approaches of technologies, such as the ones listed above, to enable the collection of datasets to rigorously determine, the residence time, distribution, sources and sinks of PMD. We feel that this session will be well-received by the PMD research community and will provide a framework for future large-scale PMD budget estimations.


    University of Toronto, Chelsea Rochman

    Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Sang Hee Hong,

    Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Wonjoon Shim

    National Institute of Standards and Technology, Jennifer Lynch

    Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Hideshige Takada

    University of Patras, Hrissi Karapanagioti

     

    This session will include laboratory and field research studies related t the chemistry of plastic marine debris, including topics such as chemical characterization and weathering of plastic debris, chemical detection and quantification methods, and the fate of additives or accumulated ambient chemicals.

     

    Plastic makes up the majority of marine debris. Plastics are synthetic polymers with diverse molecular structures. When they enter the environment, plastic undergoes physical, chemical and biological weathering which decreases its size via fragmentation and alters its original shape, chemical composition and surface characteristics. As such, chemical techniques are used to measure several variables related to plastic debris. Plastic particles in the micro- and nanometer scales are difficult to identify and quantify, and thus chemical techniques such as Raman and FTIR have become critical. Because plastics in the marine environment are made up of several types of polymers with diverse additive chemicals, chemistry techniques are used to identify and quantify the fate of chemicals from manufacturing.

     

    For example, leaching of additive chemicals is facilitated by plastic fragmentation. Moreover, it is well known that plastics accumulate organic and metal pollutants from ambient seawater, including priority pollutants that have been banned for decades (i.e., PCBs and DDT). Scientists have used modeling, laboratory experiments and field research to help answer questions about how chemicals accumulate onto plastics, leach from plastics and affect organisms. For example, studies suggest the transfer of toxic chemicals (PCBs, PBDEs, and phthalates) from marine plastics to biota that ingest plastics can occur. This session aims to highlight studies that focus on: 1) analytical methods to detect, identify, and quantify synthetic polymers, including particles from the nano- to the macro-scale, in complex environmental media including sewage, sediments, and biological tissue, 2) physiochemical characterization of plastics, 3) weathering and fragmentation of plastic debris, 4) the fate of additive chemicals, monomers and oligomers in aquatic habitats and animals 6) the fate of sorbed contaminants in aquatic habitats and animals, and 7) toxicological effects of chemicals associated with plastic debris in marine organisms.


    University of Toronto, Chelsea Rochman

    Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Matthew Cole

     

    This session focuses on new experimental evidence regarding the impacts of microplastics on fish and invertebrates in aquatic ecosystems.

     

    Microplastic pollution has been identified in habitats and animals, in both freshwater and marine ecosystems, from all over the world. Microplastics contaminate every level of aquatic foodchains, from the smallest zooplankton to the largest vertebrates. This begs the question: how does microplastic impact animals that become contaminated via ingestion or absorption? The weight of evidence regarding impacts is rapidly increasing. This session aims to highlight new findings that demonstrate the effects that microplastic (and associated co-contaminants) can have upon fish and invertebrates. This session will highlight both field and laboratory research investigating how microplastic exposure can affect fish and invertebrates at multiple levels of biological organization. Scientific presentations in this session will contribute novel findings, work to close some of the key research gaps relating to plastic pollution, and address topics relevant to policy change.


    Ocean Conservancy, Nicholas Mallos

     

    This session will focus on microfibers in marine environments with a focus on the latest science, research priorities, and current and potential solutions to mitigate the problem.

     

    Marine debris from microfibers is increasingly gaining the attention of the news media, environmental NGOs and scientists. Microfibers have been reported in rain and aquatic habitats (both freshwater and marine) across the globe. In some instances, they are the most common type of marine debris found in habitats and inside animals including fish and shellfish purchased from public fish markets. Science confirms that laundering textiles is one important source of fiber emissions, demonstrating that microfibers are released from clothing during washing and enter wastewater via washing machine effluent. Despite increased attention on microfibers, our understanding of the emissions, fate and toxicity of microfibers is relatively limited. However, our current understanding suffices to warrant action. With the appropriate multi-stakeholder approach, we can collaborate to not just talk about microfiber contamination, but actually begin to mitigate it. This panel will bring leaders from academia, conservation, and the textile and/or apparel industries to lay out the background of the issue, define future research priorities, and discuss solutions to this emerging debris threats to ocean health


    Swell Consulting, Lauren Blickley

    Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Megan Lamson

     

    This session evaluates the role of marine debris research in supporting policies, programs, and clean up strategies to reduce local marine debris loads.

     

    Increasingly, counties, states, and countries - particularly those in coastal areas - are turning to legislation and directed grassroots efforts to reduce marine debris inputs. The creation, though, of effective mitigation and removal actions requires an understanding of debris sources and loads. Collaborations and partnerships that arise from marine debris research are therefore proving increasingly important to informing and guiding these local marine debris efforts.

     

    This session would evaluate the role of marine debris research in supporting policies, programs, and clean up strategies to reduce local marine debris loads. It would demonstrate how research has been effectively utilized to inform both removal and reduction efforts, and highlight the relevancy of marine debris studies to small- and large-scale mitigation programs and/or policies. The session furthermore aims to identify research gaps that would be helpful in supporting mitigation efforts, share best practices in terms of connecting science to policy action and education programs, and explore the role of opportunities such as citizen science to inform marine debris action.

     

    The session would provide examples of applied marine debris research and publications that have informed both removal and reduction efforts.


    CSIRO,Britta Denise Hardesty, Chris Wilcox

    Arizona State University, Beth Polidoro

     

    This session provides practitioners, community groups, businesses, government agencies and scientists with different tools and approaches to assess ecological and public health risk from exposure to marine debris, including microplastics.

     

    Understanding plastic pollution from a systems perspective requires a way of conceptualizing sources, distribution and dynamics in the environment; identifying or quantifying impacts on wildlife, humans and other assets; and identifying and evaluating potential management responses. The uncertainties in our knowledge and the difficulty in resolving them satisfactorily can be challenging, given that we are confined to working with largely observational data because experiments at scale are difficult or impossible. To advance our understanding of the risk posed by anthropogenic debris, we suggest applying a conceptual framework that allows us to break the components into smaller parts that not only integrates uncertainty but also connects variables of interest to outcomes in which we are focused.

     

    In a regulatory context, risk assessments are often the first step in developing pollutant regulations, improved resource management, and policies to protect ecological and human health. Given the exponential growth of research and monitoring in marine debris and the potential for toxicological or other adverse impacts, approaches to assess ecological, economic, biodiversity and public health risk are needed to encourage science that can underpin sound policy decision making, as well as to identify critical areas for restoration and research.

     

    The proposed session will bring together a variety of speakers representing academia, government agencies, and conservation organizations to provide a diversity of perspectives, tools and approaches to assessing risk. Topics will include quantitative and qualitative approaches to risk assessment, demonstrated through research and case studies. Methods and tools that are especially useful in data-poor regions will be highlighted, in addition to more refined, or probabilistic methods for use in areas where more data are available.


    University of Western Ontario, Dr. Patricia Corcoran

    NOAA Marine Debris Program, Sarah Lowe

    University of Wisconsin-Superior, Dr. Lorena M. Rios Mendoza

     

    This session will gather experts in the field of freshwater plastic debris research to discuss and outline the current state of knowledge, share lessons-learned on techniques and challenges in freshwater systems, and educate the wider marine debris community about upstream effects.

     

    Distribution and impacts of plastic pollution and other marine debris have been well documented in the world's oceans and marine ecosystems. Researchers have only recently begun to explore the abundance and impacts of plastic debris in freshwater environments, including lakes, tributaries, effluents, and their associated sediments. Although there are similarities between plastics in marine and freshwater environments, recent research suggests that marine-specific protocols and results may not be entirely relevant to freshwater systems, especially in regard to debris size, toxicology pathways, and the role of wind and currents in debris distribution. Plastic particles, whether large or small, have the potential to cause environmental and human health consequences. In addition, the lack of harmonization of analytical methodologies from sampling to analysis hinder the comparison of existing quantitative results.

     

    This session will gather experts in the field of freshwater debris research to discuss and outline the current state of knowledge, share lessons-learned on techniques and challenges in freshwater systems, and educate the wider marine debris community about upstream effects. Plastic debris has been identified on every continent, including Antarctica, and thus, the global scope of the issue will attract speakers from numerous countries. The pervasiveness of plastic and its use on a global scale will incite members of the research community, government and not-for-profit organizations to attend the conference. The session will be an appropriate companion to concurrent oceanic and other marine-focused sessions. Following the conclusion of the session and conference, chairs will develop a summary paper of the current state of research in freshwater environments to be published in a peer-reviewed journal.


    Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Cathryn Clarke Murray

    Alexander Bychkov, North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES)

     

    This session is dedicated to researchers and managers working on large-scale marine debris issues, this session will highlight many novel advances, applications, and lessons learned from Japanese Tsunami Marine Debris study in the North Pacific that can be used elsewhere.

     

    The Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami of March 2011 resulted in a unique mega-pulse marine debris event that became the subject of many long-term intensive research programs around the North Pacific Ocean. In addition to the sheer magnitude of this event, Japanese Tsunami Marine Debris (JTMD) became an important vector for many Japanese species to reach the shorelines of North America and Hawaii.

     

    This session will focus on exciting advances in marine debris research that have arisen from efforts to characterize and understand JTMD behavior, including higher resolution ocean modeling of marine debris movement, the development of novel surveillance and monitoring tools for marine debris landfall and accumulation, and the application of bioforensics and risk assessments to determine the potential threats from exotic species transported by long-lasting anthropogenic rafts. Although tsunamis and other large-scale natural disasters will remain difficult to predict, lessons learned from the research arising from the 2011 Great Japan Tsunami provide a framework for other mega-pulse events, including predicting the potential fate and impacts associated with the sudden appearance of huge debris fields in the ocean, that can inform management decision-making or policy development around marine debris.

     

    It is estimated that the human population will to grow by 2 billion people over the next 25 years, with approximately 40% living within 100 km of the world’s coastlines, suggesting the amount of anthropogenic material available for ocean-entry will rise significantly in the coming decades. In turn, global climate change is already affecting the frequency and scale of storm activity, including hurricanes, typhoons, and monsoons, which increases the probability and magnitude of future mega-pulse debris events. This session welcomes submissions related to JTMD and other mega-pulse debris events. Further, the trans-oceanic movement of species on marine debris is an emerging issue in invasion research, and submissions on this are also welcome.


    French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER), Francois Galgani

    UN Environment Barcelona Convention Secretariat, Tatiana Hema

     

    This session is dedicated to scientists, stakeholders, institutions and managers to present and discuss their results from research and monitoring marine litter in the Mediterranean Sea and propose or discuss reduction measures in the framework of the Mediterranean Regional Action Plans.

     

    Because of large cities, rivers and shore uses, some of the largest amounts of Municipal Solid Waste that are generated annually per person (208 – 760 kg/Year), because of tourism and intense fishing, 30% of the world’s maritime traffic, a closed basin, and insufficient infrastructure to process the wastes, the Mediterranean sea has been described as one of the most affected areas by marine litter in the world. As a consequence, densities were found to reach over 100,000 items per square kilometer of seabed and over 64 million particles per square kilometer in the Levantine basin. For the whole Mediterranean basin, it was predicted that, without management measures, the amount of plastic dumped may raise by a factor of more than 2 before 2025. Research also demonstrated the importance of hydrodynamics and the environmental impact of plastic at sea that include entanglement, ingestion, the rafting of species, social and economic harm.

     

    While Mediterranean countries have shown important willingness to monitor and manage marine litter, still no regular monitoring is in place, most of the times experimental, with very little coverage of any marine compartment other than beach and stranded debris. There, the main groups of items are related to coastal-based tourism, recreation and the fishing and shipping industries. Then, the most effective measures and actions taken should respond to the major sources and input pathways, and also take into consideration feasibility and the specificity of this pollution in the Mediterranean Sea.

     

    Number of key questions will have then to be considered in order to provide a scientific and technical background for a consistent monitoring, a better management system, and science based reduction measures. Further implementation of monitoring and measures is being considered within the UN Environment/MAP Regional Plan on Marine Litter Management in the Mediterranean, and in the lesser extent, the Marine strategy framework directive (MSFD), for EU countries. For the Mediterranean Sea, there is no unique/harmonized intervention, and the choice of an appropriate intervention is case specific, largely depending on the source and nature of pollution, country’s institutional characteristics and infrastructure, and the economy's sectorial composition. This will need more coordination and exchange of information to better implement the possible instruments to reduce marine litter.

     

    In the context of the 6th IMDC, the session will provide a forum to enable the presentation of updated results from research and monitoring, identify research needs of knowledge, support monitoring and management of marine litter. This will also enable exchange among the parties and scientist or managers from other basins and finally coordinated actions to reduce marine litter.


    Algalita Marine Research and Education, Captain Charles Moore PhD

    Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) Shelly Moore

     

    This session is focused on the understanding how persistent marine debris accumulating in oceanic gyres is affecting marine organisms and community structures is key to continuing the discussions of what can be done to alleviate the increased debris accumulation stress.

     

    The movement of debris from land-based sources, as well as debris input from the ocean-based fishing industry into oceanic current systems have been shown to result in the accumulation of marine debris in subtropical gyres. Subtropical gyres serve essential roles as nursery areas for many pelagic species, including sea turtles. The accumulation of persistent plastic debris in these areas serves to skew the species distribution. Species that utilize the available and accumulated debris will find these conditions to be favorable, whereas others will not. Modelling in these areas show how the debris moves with the oceanic currents into the gyre accumulation areas. In addition, monitoring by organizations, such as the Algalita Marine Research and Education, has documented substantial increases in the quantity of debris in an area known as the "Eastern Garbage Patch". This area has been shown to be a heavy accumulation zone within the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Recent surveys in this area have shown that certain coastal species such as sea anemones are increasing in these areas. The accumulation of debris in subtropical gyres also effects foraging opportunities for seabirds, such as the Albatross. Analysis of the stomach contents of Laysan Albatross on Midway and Kure atolls show that bottle caps are the most common debris item.

     

    These examples show how much work remains to be done to address the changes in species composition and survival in areas of high debris accumulation. With the recent monitoring in remote areas of the Artic showing the presence of persistent marine debris, this problem has been elevated to even more of a global scale, with clear international implications. The Sixth International Marine Debris Conference is a perfect forum for continuing the discussions on how to address this significant environmental problem. The goal of this session will be to bring together those doing research in these areas, not to just report on the research, but also to strategize moving forward to develop methodologies and recommendations for actions and solutions to address and solve this overarching problem.


    Keep America Beautiful, Cecile Carson

    California State University, P Wesley Schultz

     

    This session is focused on behavior scientists, researchers, community leaders, NGOs. local government, and general public interested in learning more about why people litter and how to address.

     

    Like many social problems, litter and marine debris is caused by human behavior.  Whether intentional or accidental, litter begins with the individual.  Given the social, economic, and environmental problems that result from litter, numerous interventions have been developed, implemented, and evaluated.  Yet despite these efforts, litter continues to be a problem.    In an effort to go beyond the typical self‐report measures used to study littering behavior, our research includes observations of individuals in a diverse sample of public locations. With regard to general littering, our statistical analyses revealed several important predictors. In addition to our systematic observations of disposal behaviors, Keep America Beautiful randomly selected locations where we conducted intercept interviews with the observed disposers. The goal was to obtain a small, representative sample of individuals and to link the responses from our intercept interview to the observed disposal behaviors. At each of the selected intercept locations, individuals who had been observed disposing (either properly or improperly) were approached to take part in a face‐to‐face survey.

     

    A combined set of strategies is necessary to address the issues to end littering and improve recycling. For over 40 years, Keep America Beautiful has used a Behavioral Methodology to identify littering behaviors and implement and evaluate strategies that change littering behaviors. A Behavioral Advisory Council consisting of academic and cultural experts began a refresh and relaunch of the original model. During this session, researchers and in-field practitioners will share current research to address the behaviors and strategies and methods to encourage proper disposal and reduce waste.                                 

     

    Topics of discussion will include but not be limited to: community appearance and value of consistent and ongoing community clean‐up activities convenience to containers - clean‐up efforts in the absence of infrastructure  changes are likely to produce effects that are short‐lived; role for awareness and motivation campaigns - Ad Council, local messaging and signages using research from the I Want to Be campaign targeting recycling and plastic recycling specifically; review of 2016 recycling attitudes and behavior survey to determine the value individuals place on recycling and convenience


    Utrecht University, Erik van Sebille

    Sea Education Association, Kara Lavendar Law

     

    This session focuses on how ocean waves and ocean currents move around the world. It also looks how how does this transport impact the fate and transport of marine debris in the ocean.

     

    After plastic debris enters the ocean, its distribution is to a large extent determined by the ocean circulation; in particular waves and currents. Knowing how and where marine debris is transported by the ocean is key to understanding its fate and impact on marine ecosystems.

     

    Oceanographic phenomena that impact the transport and dispersion of marine debris occur on a large range of scales, from thousands of kilometers for the Ekman convergence in the subtropical gyres to a few centimeters for the Stokes drift by individual surface waves. The way that these different phenomena affect the dispersion of marine debris, and how this leads to the emergence of patchy accumulation regions and ‘hotspots’, is a major knowledge gap.

     

    In this session, we invite presentations on advances in the theory and modelling, possibly supported by observations, of marine debris of all sizes and materials. Topics include but are not limited to:

    - The stirring of buoyant debris due to turbulence, in particular in the mixed layer.

    -The transport of plastic in coastal seas, from the surf zone to the open ocean.

    -The effects of Stokes drift, Langmuir circulation, and other (nonlinear) wind effects on the transport of debris.

    -The effects of fragmentation, degradation, bio aggregation and biofouling on the evolution of the buoyancy of debris particles.

    -The movement and transport of debris in the water column and/or on the sea floor.

    -Development of and comparison between tools and software to simulate the dispersion of debris.


    5 Gyres Institute, Marcus Eriksen

    UC Riverside, Win Cowger

     

    This session looks at merging the many datasets of plastic debris on land and sea is a monumental challenge, doing so allows richer questions about source, sink, distribution and trends. This session will appeal to an audience interested in citizen science, as well as modelers of distribution patterns of debris on land and sea.

     

    In this session will bring together marine debris practitioners to discuss their data collection process and lessons learned to improve comparability and utility on regional and international scales. We will focus on new advances and data synchronization.

     

    Here we aim to bring together the many data sets on land and sea that document plastic pollution. Globally the public, private, nonprofit and education sectors overlap in their efforts to document observations of plastic pollution, from nano to macro, in marine environments and on land, using varied methods.

     

    At sea we use nets, filtered pumps, and sea surface or seafloor visual observations. On land, surveys of beaches, roads, streams, as well as waste characterizations of litter conducted by municipalities, create rich data sets. There are many organizations, universities and government agencies, like NOAA, The Great Nurdle Hunt, SEA Education, Living Lands and Waters, SCCWRP, EOA, and Keep America Beautiful that have developed litter surveys. The Ocean Conservancy, Litterati, and Marine Debris Tracker have created mobile apps to engage the public in data collection. Many environmental NGOs, like Surfrider, Coastkeeper and 5 Gyres, have created their own data sets. The sum of these efforts is tremendous data, but there are challenges in content and comparability. How do we put it all together and make sense of it? To answer, a group from the Alfred-Wegener-Institute, created LITTERBASE, a pool of academic research on plastic pollution.

     

    We looked on land in 2016 to create the Better Alternatives Now List, which combined all land litter data from cities, mobile apps and beach cleanups for California only. In 2017 we are looking at the same for the entire U.S. These data show greater spatial resolution when lumped together, despite challenges to find common methods of categorizing types of products and packaging.

     

    In the sea we combined all known historical data about sea surface floating plastic with our most recent data from our 2013-2017 Travel Trawl citizen science program, reported in multiyear increments from 1980 to present. With greater consistency in data reporting (particle count (#/km2) and (weight kg/km2) we were able to produce a new global budget for floating debris.

     

    These two datasets are useful to show trends in debris accumulation, the natural systems that remove plastic from the sea, and the efficiency of mitigations on land. They also point to the need to continue engaging citizens in meaningful data collection that's comparable to other efforts. Future monitoring and mitigation require this engagement and consistency, but also a transparent discussion about how these data are utilized.


    Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Tracy Mincer

    Utrech University, Linda Amaral-Zettler

     

    This session looks at the plastic marine debris budget, news media and general public to determine best path forward.

     

    Plastics have become the most common form of marine debris in the 60 years since they have entered the consumer arena and present a major and growing pollution concern. As materials of immense utility and durability, plastics represent a growth industry, with the current annual global production exceeding the total human biomass on our planet. Unfortunately, mismanagement of plastic waste is commonplace. It is estimated that nearly a third of single-use plastics escape the waste stream, creating the most common mechanism for the creation of plastic marine debris (PMD) in coastal regions. Once these predominantly buoyant plastic materials enter the ocean they can migrate large distances. For example, PMD from U. S. Northeastern Seaboard locations can migrate over 1000 kilometers to the interior of the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre (NASG), in less than 60 days. Surface net tow surveys by several research groups have quantified PMD in the NASG and North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Additionally, PMD has been documented to accumulate in all five of the world’s subtropical gyres, coastal areas, and remote areas including the Marianas Trench, Arctic and Antarctic sea ice, and pristine tropical islands. Indeed, it is now apparent that all ocean habitats have the potential to be impacted by PMD. However, the overall risk of microplastics (commonly described as 5 millimeters to 1 micrometer in size) and nanoplastics (less than 1 micrometer in size) on biota such as filter feeding species is underexplored.

     

    On average, it is estimated that 8 million metric tons of plastic escape the waste stream and enter our oceans annually. A recent model projected that over 150 million tons have been input to the oceans since plastic has entered the consumer arena. Paradoxically, the highest PMD estimate from recent global surface ocean surveys is only 250,000 metric tons– orders of magnitude lower than the amount of PMD projected, begging the question: “Where is all the plastic?” New technologies such as Raman Spectroscopy and micro-FTIR are allowing unprecedented detection of micro- and even nanoplastics. And methods separating micro- and nanoplastics from sediments and water column particulates such as ‘marine snow’ are yielding new insights into the distributions of PMD. Microbes have also been shown to interact with PMD, decreasing buoyancy, and possibly accelerating its degradation. These microbial consortia colonizing PMD can now be analyzed with powerful laser-scanning confocal visualization methods and combined with molecular probes, providing new insights into the spatial and temporal organization of biofilms on PMD. Computational models integrating datasets are yielding insight into the distribution of PMD below the ocean surface.      

     

    The overarching theme and goal of this session is to discuss integrative approaches of technologies, such as the ones listed above, to enable the collection of datasets to rigorously determine, the residence time, distribution, sources and sinks of PMD. We feel that this session will be well-received by the PMD research community and will provide a framework for future large-scale PMD budget estimations.


    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Sydney Harris

    Clean Water Fund, Samantha Sommer

     

    This session will help citizen scientists and other problem solvers engage in upstream solutions to prevent marine litter.

     

    Preventing trash from reaching marine waters is a key part of the marine debris effort. At present, there are many gaps in our knowledge of how trash gets into waterways. Rigorous data that can form the basis for clear policies and practices is necessary to address these gaps. This session will bring together an interdisciplinary mix of professionals from the solid waste and materials management sector, citizen and academic researchers collecting upstream data on waste prevention efficacy and best practices, and experts in social marketing and behavior change to discuss leading strategies in upstream waste prevention so that we can stop marine debris at the source.

     

    There is ample evidence showing single-use disposable food-ware items make up the bulk of marine plastic litter. Those findings point toward source reduction solutions because recycling and composting programs not only cannot capture all of the items being used, but all single-use items, whether land-filled, recycled, composted, or littered, use a substantial amount of resources compared to the fewer amount of reusable items that can replace them. Representatives of ReThink Disposable and other organizations will share their experiences with the costs, benefits, difficulties, and rewards they have found in efforts to replace disposable items with reusable items. Those who attend the session will gain insights into quantifying the cost savings, waste reduction, and greenhouse gas emissions reduction associated with various best practices.

     

    It would be fun to have a field trip to two nearby commercial establishments, one that uses single use items and one that uses durables, so participants can conduct an observatory exercise on the street-scape nearby (with pre-prepared data sheets). Then, we can compare their findings to see how similar or different they are.


    Think Beyond Plastic, Daniella Russo

    Think Beyond Plastic, Anne Warner

     

    This session supports the systemic, permanent reduction of marine plastic pollution, we must embrace the theory of design thinking and build the supporting economic engine by harnessing the forces of innovation, entrepreneurship, impact investment, transformative public policy, and civil society.

     

    There is an unprecedented confluence of concern about plastic pollution and its impact on ecosystems, the world ocean, and public health, combined with a notable lack of strategic, scalable, long-term solutions. Existing interventions focused on end-of-pipeline infrastructures such as recycling, incineration, plugging current leakage points, waste-to-oil conversion, etc. are inadequate. At best, they can increase recycling rates, but they are not capable of supporting the explosive rates of production and consumption or the market dynamics of an economy where recycled materials cost more than virgin plastic.

     

    A new approach is required. One that embraces design thinking and focuses on building the economic engine to support systemic, permanent reduction of marine and land-based plastic pollution. This economic engine will eliminate reliance on philanthropy and public funds, the unnecessary and growing investment in waste mitigation, and the toxic impacts of plastic pollution on human health and ecosystems. It means investments in forward-looking innovations, including new materials, new manufacturing processes, new recycling processes, and new design following the principles of a circular economy.

     

    The social enterprise for a targeted geographical area must be developed in collaboration with local partners (NGOs, policymakers, and businesses) and relevant stakeholders and by following an innovation ecosystem approach. Leveraging partnerships is key. Disruptive innovation should be directed toward key problem areas of plastic pollution where consumption is the highest and market failures are the greatest.

     

    Using this model, Think Beyond Plastic launched a pilot project on the Bay Islands of Honduras in December 2015. As a result of the project’s healthy and sustained growth, the pilot is ready to replicate in early 2018 in Cozumel, Mexico and then throughout other communities of the Mesoamerican Reef.       The long-term vision for the project is a Mesoamerican Reef free of plastic pollution and a global model for eliminating ocean plastic pollution by developing the underlying economic engine supporting the shift away from conventional plastics to alternatives.  Benefits of this approach include that it: (1) is regenerative by design; (2) produces incremental revenues due to education prompting changes in behavior; (3) promotes synergistic impacts among the environment, economics, and health; and (4) transitions away from the linear economy of use-discard to a circular economy of reuse.

     

    We will present our progressive and holistic approach to the problem of marine plastic pollution through innovation and entrepreneurship using our experiences on the Bay Islands and Mesoamerican Reef as a specific case study. We will share our progress in working toward specific goals, targeted impacts, and deliverables on the project as well as our vision for future expansion to other geographies.


    NOAA Marine Debris Program, Sarah Latshaw

    NOAA Marine Debris Program, Sherry Lippiatt

     

    This session will explore strategies to reduce the social and environmental impacts of marine debris affecting and generated by vulnerable populations.

     

    Vulnerable communities struggle with a litany of social issues, which includes being both directly impacted by and a contributing source of litter and marine debris. From trash pickers who rely on collecting discarded scraps to support their families, to poor communities who lack the political influence to say “not in my backyard”, these communities are exposed to many hazards related to mismanaged waste and marine debris. Additionally, debris generated by low-income and homeless populations is a growing problem here in San Diego and across the United States, but also prevalent in Least Developed Countries worldwide. In California, homeless encampments are common in or adjacent to rivers and streams, and a source of a significant amount of marine debris. This is a sensitive topic that should be approached bearing in mind higher priority needs, but a significant source of marine debris that the community should consider.

     

    This session will explore the interconnectedness of environmental and social issues, particularly as it pertains to waste generation and leakage into the marine environment. We invite presentations on efforts and strategies to address litter and marine debris that affect vulnerable communities or are generated by the homeless and those living in poverty, including cleanup programs, effective partnerships across disciplines, and other success stories or lessons learned. Other presentations related to environmental justice and marine debris are also welcome.


    Plastic Pollution Coalition, a project of Earth Island Institute, Jane Patton

    Ecoconsultant, Genevieve Abedon

     

    This panel will be a call to action to all groups engaged in solutions for plastic pollution / marine litter work to engage as equals with communities of color and others that are disproportionately affected to innovate, create, and adopt best practices.

     

    Too often in the plastic pollution / marine litter / ocean conservation / environmental protection fight, the conversations are led by relatively affluent groups, representative of those traditionally in power in their respective countries, who often live and work in coastal areas. We as a global community do not always do the necessary work of valuing the experience, uplifting the innovations, and highlighting the hard-earned successes of other groups and individuals doing the work. We could be and should be doing a better job of engaging and empowering non-traditional allied voices who are a ) disproportionately affected by plastic pollution/marine litter, b) have shown in polling to deeply care about the issue, and c) inland and near non-coastal waterways that eventually lead to the marine environment.

     

    This panel is meant to highlight this and to propose best practices for checking our own biases and ensuring environmental actions and the environmental movement as a whole, locally and globally,  includes all communities affected by, and also equally able to take on the solutions to, global environmental concerns, particularly marine litter/plastic pollution. 

     

    Audience members will be treated to an honest, emotional, deeply important discussion on how this form of bias has oftentimes left out those who are affected by plastic pollution/marine litter, and their voices will be welcomed in deciding on best practices for overcoming it and moving forward. Empower them to take matters into their own hands


    Plastic Pollution Coalition, Jane Patton

    Seventh Generation Advisors, Leslie Tamminen

     

    This session looks at a global toolkit for plastic pollution source reduction actions for regulators and advocates in developing (LDCs and SIDs) and developed subnationals/countries.

     

    Nongovernmental environmental organizations Plastic Pollution Coalition and Upstream, in consultation with Seventh Generation Advisors, BreakFreeFromPlastic, Zero Waste Europe, GAIA, the State of California, and others will introduce a global toolkit for reducing singleuse packaging and plastic pollution through source reduction actions. The toolkit is meant for advocates and regulators in developed countries and subnational governments, as well as developing countries, including LDCs and SIDs. The toolkit will focus on actions for integral policies such as Extended Producer Responsibility, and, as of the date of the conference, actions on predominate type of plastic litter such as plastic bags and polystyrene (the toolkit will eventually reach other products such as micro beads, straws, cups, etc.). Meant to be a comprehensive online resource, it will be a compilation of local, state and federal singleuse plastic bag and polystyrene mandates across the globe, existing ordinances and statues, regulatory effectiveness information, scientific data, legal resources, and community engagement tools for regulators and for advocates. As a global, nonbranded resource, it will necessarily rely upon linkages to multiple other organizations, institutions, and agencies.      

     

    It is important for conference attendees to understand how the toolkit is structured, and its utility to their specific situation: panelists will provide a brief introduction about how and why the toolkit was developed (currently, there is not an up-to-date, international source reduction compendium resource for regulators and advocates), and an in-depth review of toolkit contents, with specific focus on graphic charts that correlate actions to a specific outcome, and actions to a category of user (e.g., developed or developing nation or subnational government). Panelists will also include a summary about prospective additions to the toolkit postconference. Session attendees will gain an understanding about a valuable resource for a wide range of source reduction actions and policies.


    NOAA Fisheries/NMFS/Protected Resources Division, Kim Raum-Suryan

    World Animal Protection, Elizabeth Hogan

     

    This session looks at pinniped entanglement in marine debris: Identifying the problem, methods to reduce and prevent entanglements, innovative techniques for pinniped disentanglement, lessons learned, and next steps toward a solution.

     

    Marine debris is a global concern affecting at least 200 marine species in the world’s oceans. The entanglement of marine mammals in all forms of marine debris is increasingly recognized as a serious source of human-caused mortality for marine mammal populations including pinnipeds. Marine debris most commonly associated with pinniped entanglements include plastic packing bands, fishing nets, monofilament line, rope, crab traps, rubber bands from crab traps, and fish pots. Entangling debris may cause drowning, lacerations, infection, strangulation, increased energy expenditure (especially while dragging large fragments of net), and mortality. Moreover, marine debris can be a ‘‘silent” killer, where ingested hooks or plastic may perforate the esophagus or stomach lining leading to catastrophic infection, organ damage, reduce feeding, and cause starvation; all with no apparent external signs of entanglement.

     

    Researchers world-wide have worked independently to prevent pinniped entanglement in marine debris. To provide increased global collaboration and communication among scientists, non-government organizations, non-profits, and others, the Pinniped Entanglement Group (PEG) was created in 2009. The PEG collaborates to reduce pinniped entanglements in marine debris and fishing gear through education, outreach, and rescue. The PEG continues to grow globally and welcomes new members dedicated to the safety and welfare of pinnipeds.

     

    This session will discuss: 1) Global pinniped entanglement research; 2) Entanglement rescue response (including best practices and lessons learned); 3) Entanglement prevention and PEG; and 4) Innovative solutions and next steps.


    Ocean Conservancy, Eric DesRoberts

    Ocean Conservancy, Susan Ruffo

     

    This session will focus on decisions made at different points along product value chains, why some of these decisions create problems for our ocean, and what can be done to solve these problems by bringing diverse stakeholders together.

     

    No single entity is going to be able to address marine debris alone and multiple parties will have to come together to truly create systemic change. However, aside from the recognition that plastic litter does not belong in the ocean, there are often grey areas and tradeoffs to be assessed throughout a product and packaging system that make the topic of marine debris incredibly complex. The panelists for this session all oversee networks of industry, NGO, and academic thought-leaders to address marine debris from multiple angles and create robust and resilient solutions. The panelists will discuss some of the design decisions behind items and materials that pose some of the biggest marine debris challenges, the importance of including more system based thinking into operations, and  the business case for addressing marine debris. This session will focus on decisions made at different points along product value chains, why some of these decisions create problems for our ocean, and what can be done to solve these problems by bringing diverse stakeholders together.


    Department of Chemistry, University of Patras,Hrissi K. Karapanagioti

    Hellenic Open Univeristy, Ioannis Kalavrouziotis

     

    This session is dedicated to researchers, operators, stakeholders, and regulators can participate, results of monitoring studies in wastewater treatment plants that as well as best practices.

     

    Most of the microplastic particles and synthetic fibers can be effectively removed by the different WWTP processes depending on their density. However, more efficient methods such as microfiltration should be employed to protect the environment. Despite the high efficient removal rates of microplastics achieved by WWTPs when dealing with such a large volume of effluent even a modest amount of microplastics being released per litter of effluent could result in significant amounts of microplastics entering the environment. In most cases, microplastics and synthetic fibers concentration was higher in the WWTP effluent compared to the receiving body of water. This indicates that WWTPs may operate as a route for microplastics entering the sea. WWTPs can act as a primary source for beached microplastics.

     

    WWTP operators should be informed and educated on how to address this issue regulators should prohibit the use of microplastics in personal care products and consumer decision should be based on common sense practices. Studies dealing with monitoring, good practices, educating and informing operators and manager will be welcomed to present. WWTPs is a totally preventable route for microplastics to the sea and should be eliminated.       The specific intent of the session is to bring WWTP operators to a marine debris conference that will allow them to understand the marine debris problem, allow them to understand what is microplastic and its chemistry, find ways to monitor microplastics and motivate them to eliminate this point source of microplastic to the sea.       Marine debris community will learn about this preventable source and be motivated to stop this input to the sea since it is preventable.


    KCI Technologies, Inc., Thomas G Sprehe

    Clearwater Mills,  John Kellett

     

    An international panel of experts is proposed to highlight an “engineering approach” to defining addressing the risk and urgency of the problem, disrupting the paradigm, source control, scope, scale, cost, and timeline of interception projects, and performance measurement

     

    Given the relatively short timeframe during which humans have polluted the Earth with durable plastic, say +/1- 60 years, the accelerating loading rates worldwide should sound loud bells of alarm. As we become aware of the mounting evidence that bioaccumulation of microplastics often attainted with toxic waste, is already widespread in our oceanic food chain, the implications for a growing po0pulation dependent on a vi9brant ocean ecosystem are horrendous. Solid waste professionals have just woken up to the fact that a gap in sanitation practices cine the beginning of the plastic economy has in a short time had a significant negative global effect. Complex as the issue of marine debris waste management may be, by using the standard engineering problem solving approach the problem must be systematically addressed evaluating risk, urgency, applicable metrics, efficient design with life cycle optimization, contract delivery and financing models, and long-term performance management. Stakeholder engagement and support increases dramatically when the right engineering solutions are successfully presented as evidenced by over 35 million hits on Mr Trash Wheels Latest Youtube video within the first five months in 2017.

     

    Tom Sprehe and John Kelleit have evaluated dozens of locations worldwide for implementation of river borne trash interception controls, in particular the patented Waterwheel-powered Trash Inceptor Mr Trash Wheel first developed in Baltimore, MD by Kelleit. By deploying this and similar technology, the opportunity for immediate and effective triage of the sources of discharge to the oceans is huge, may be relatively inexpensive, provide meaningful employment, use primary sustainable energy. Other similar technologies exist at smaller scales. In all cases the relatively simple equipment may be easily removed and repurposed as upland sources are eventually better managed or other developments may require it.

     

    In addition to Tom and John and Adam Lindquist from the Waterfront Partnership of Baltimore, Axel Grael and Rudy Chow ( all invited) and possible other international experts will provide lessons learned as effective marine debris inception systems are being implemented worldwide.

     

    The session is intended to be coordinated with the other session related to Marine Debris Diagnostic and Restoration Planning, and the Business Case for Managing Marine Debris


    NOAA Marine Debris Program, Amy Uhrin

     

    This session will introduce economic concepts and theory relevant to public policy issues and concerns about marine debris, estimate costs associated with marine debris, evaluate the economic benefit of removal/cleanup programs, and/or highlight successful market-based instruments for preventing introduction of marine debris.  

     

    Marine debris can affect several economic sectors including aquaculture, fisheries, commercial shipping, recreational boating, local coastal governments, coastal tourism, and emergency response services. The costs associated with marine debris can be direct (i.e., beach cleanups, gear replacement) or indirect (i.e., impacts to biodiversity and ecosystem services). To date, few studies have addressed the costs to society associated with marine debris, limiting the ability to construct effective and efficient policy instruments. In this session, we welcome presentations that introduce economic concepts and theory relevant to public policy issues and concerns about marine debris, estimate costs associated with marine debris, evaluate the economic benefit of removal/cleanup programs, and/or highlight successful market-based instruments for preventing introduction of marine debris


    NOAA Marine Debris Program, Peter Murphy

     

    This session will advance and efforts for the detection, quantification and prioritization of marine debris in shoreline and nearshore environments, including techniques for application of emerging technologies such as UAS and automated post-processing.  

     

    Better understanding the amount, composition and location of marine debris has important applications in improved understanding of sources, impact pathways, and optimal solutions both by prevention and removal.

     

    Remote sensing, here meaning primarily aerial survey, has proven capacity to provide high-value products that aid in assessing the presence, concentration and composition of debris in multiple environments. The use of georeferenced photo survey of shorelines to quantify marine debris goes back decades, but is continuing to evolve; integrating new technologies and techniques to provide more capable and flexible products and tools. Likewise, the marine debris community is also working to integrate new platforms including UAS (Unmanned Aerial Systems) of different sizes and capabilities to answer multiple debris questions. Regardless of platform, surveys create huge amounts of data, in imagery, video, or other formats that must be analyzed in a frequently labor-intensive effort.   Advancements in post processing techniques, including automated analysis have the capacity to improve the efficiency and accuracy of these efforts.  

     

    This session will bring together experts in aerial survey operations as well as post processing techniques to provide observations and lessons learned that can help guide the planning of future aerial surveys; identifying key questions and decisions that will result in the best mix of tools and techniques for the identified need.


    University of Hawaii, Nikolai Maximenko

    Remote Sensing Solutions, Delwyn Moller

     

    This session is catered to engineers, scientists and responders will overview remote technologies available for surveillance of marine debris and factors, controlling its drift, and present existing products, results of their applications and ideas for future missions.  

     

    Traditional methods based on counting marine debris items provide fragmentary information not sufficient to help close regional and global balances of the plastic pollution. Only remote sensing, covering great areas, can fill gaps in sparse in situ point observations. Complex composition of debris, including broad ranges of sizes, shapes, and chemical composition, makes it not possible to observe all types with any single sensor.  

     

    This session invites presentations demonstrating feasibility or publishing new ideas of remote sensing technologies that can help identify, quantify, and/or track various types of plastic pollution or other types of marine debris on the ocean surface or on the shoreline.

     

    Understanding the drift of marine debris in the ocean requires good knowledge of the dynamics of the ocean-atmosphere surface circulation and is important for a growing list of operational activities, such as search and rescue and response to oil spills. Presently, even large objects can't be followed by the satellite observing system. Examples include missing flight MH370 and millions of tons of debris from the 2011 tsunami in Japan and 2004 tsunami in Indonesia, whose pathways and fate are not known or known very vaguely.

     

    Applications, derived from satellite measurements of oceanic and atmospheric variables, calibrated with the data of marine debris and used to advance the understanding of marine debris drift, are also welcome at our session.


    California Coastal Commission, Eben Schwartz

    Ocean Conservancy, Nickolas Mallos  

     

    This session will inform individuals, organizations, and decision makers on the value of leveraging partnerships and collective expertise to achieve progress on marine debris solutions.  

     

    The marine debris community is filled with silos in which various forms of work, such as research, education, and advocacy, may ultimately inform one another but generally advance independently. There are various efforts underway to break through those barriers to allow for greater collaboration and cross-cutting work. These efforts have met with some success: the International Coastal Cleanup, for example, has been underway for more than three decades, and has shown the power and promise of working together towards a single goal—keeping trash off beaches and out of waterways and the ocean.  

     

    Other efforts, such as the West Coast Marine Debris Alliance, have also enjoyed some success, such as the publication of a West Coast Marine Debris Strategy that has helped inspire local action, but have also demonstrated some of the challenges associated with cross-cutting and cross-political boundary efforts. Still others, such as the Surfrider Foundation, combine a global perspective and national campaigns with a focus on local chapters undertaking projects within communities. This session will examine these and other efforts designed to increase and promote regional and international partnerships to better coordinate marine debris work, share resources and best practices, avoid duplication of effort (increasingly important in a world of diminishing financial resources), and move the marine debris community forward in a collaborative, informed fashion.


    CNRS Laboaroire des IMRCP, Alexandra ter Halle

    CNRS Geoscience Rennes, Julien Gigault  

     

    This session focuses on microplastics, the remaining 99% part of marine litter at the micrometric and nanoscale.  

     

    Plastic debris once discarded in the environment undergoes fragmentation. As more and more data are available on microplastics occurrence (1 – 5 mm) in the environment, it has become indispensable to collect data about the abundance of plastic debris at the micrometric scale and at the nanometric scale. The ecotoxicological evaluation of these very small plastic debris has already started but with very little knowledge about their concentrations in natural waters. There is a need to develop reliable methods for counting and measuring plastic particles at the micrometric and nanometric scale. Could they be automated or semi-automated? How can the fate of microplastics be understood in this context? What are the parameters (density, surface characteristics, and shape) that need to be known in order to gain a predictive knowledge of the subject?


    American Chemistry Council, Stewart Harris

     

    This session looks at Global Plastics Alliance progress. Established in 2011 at the 5th International Marine Debris Conference, the Global Plastics Alliance has grown to 70 associations in 34 countries, and implemented over 260 projects to address marine debris under the Declaration of the Global Plastics Associations for Solutions on Marine Litter.  

     

    Established in 2011 at the 5th International Marine Debris Conference, the Global Plastics Alliance (GPA) has grown to 70 associations in 34 countries. As of the 2016 Progress Report, the GPA implemented 260 projects to address marine debris under the Declaration of the Global Plastics Associations for Solutions on Marine Litter.  

     

    Speakers from associations in the Philippines, South Africa, the Middle East, Europe, and the United States will discuss ongoing efforts to address marine debris under the six focus areas of the Global Declaration. The session will provide information on actions by the plastics industry to address marine debris by, 1. Raising Awareness, 2. Supporting Research, 3. Promoting Best Policies, 4. Spreading Knowledge, 5. Enhancing Recovery, and 6. Preventing Pellet Losses


    Rozalia Project, Rachael Miller  

     

    This session will lead to inspiration and fresh ideas from organizations who are implementing unique solutions-oriented marine debris initiatives for people working across the marine debris spectrum.

     

    It is difficult to keep track of the myriad ideas, projects and innovations happening that are related to marine debris, much less have an opportunity to speak with the innovators. Currently, there are organizations who are pushing forward technology and techniques that have the potential to make a big impact when it comes to solution-finding and implementation. 

     

    This session will give attendees an opportunity to hear from some of those innovators whose programs or ideas are viable and exciting, but not necessarily in the spotlight. This session will benefit the conference by highlighting high quality programs whose innovations could prove important to many of the conference attendees. These are more than inventions but also processes and techniques that can have measurable benefit to our oceans, lakes and rivers becoming free of marine debris.


    Sustainable Coastlines Hawaii, Kahi Pacarro

     

    This session looks at ways in providing open source and creating value from marine debris to fund education and removal that reduces its occurrence.  

     

    For thousands of years the remnants of giant trees not growing locally have washed ashore in Hawaii. These giant logs represented a gift from the Gods and were crafted into glorious Sailing canoes that endured historical journeys. This marine debris that had drifted thousands of miles to land was reinvented into a treasured vessel revered by Hawaiian civilization. With the recent return from a three year journey around the world, the Sailing Canoe Hokulea reinvigorated the possibilities of taking detritus on the beach and creating value that transcends location and time in order inspire Malama Honua (Taking care of the Earth).  

     

    Debris from abroad continues to be delivered to the coastlines of Hawaii but it is no longer looked at as a gift from the Gods nor an opportunity to explore the outer world. But collaborations between Sustainable Coastlines Hawaii, Method Home, Parley for the Oceans, Envision Plastics, Matson, The Polynesian Voyaging Society, ByFusion are aimed at changing that narrative.  

     

    Method created the first large scale project of recycling Ocean Plastic aimed at inspiring industry to utilize more post-consumer plastics into their packaging. If they could create a bottle out of degraded Ocean Plastic, others could at least stop using virgin plastic.  

     

    Parley for the Oceans took it further and brought a higher value to Ocean Plastic by collaborating with businesses to influence supply chains and products. Funds from sales of products incorporating Ocean Plastic go back to the locations where the debris was removed to further removal and education efforts.  

     

    Ocean Plastic has value. Ocean Plastic has a new purpose. Ocean Plastic can be part of the Solution.  

     

    The sessions contained within will explore the techniques, logistics, lessons learned, and paths forward to taking what was once looked at as trash on the beach or ocean community and turning it into a valuable commodity. It will focus on local solutions that can be implemented at low cost in remote locations along with tackling large scale projects that bring mass value to the end product through incorporating Ocean Plastic into the manufacturing process.  

     

    This session will benefit the conference because it will contain proactive solutions and will provide an open source path forward that anyone can implement upon returning to their community. Moving debris from our coastlines into our landfills represents high risk of reintroduction into the Ocean while incineration gasifies the debris and introduces it back into the atmosphere. Upcycling plastic pollution creates goods needed locally and can create highly desired products that teach valuable lessons that  reach a broader audience far from the Oceans.  Sales of products fund local removal and education efforts while also inspiring better consumer and manufacturer behavior.  

     

    Most importantly we will share the ultimate focus how Ocean Plastic can help to reduce consumption, improve local cleanup capacity, and slow the tap of plastics flowing into the oceans through education.   Currently working on creating a collaboration between Surfrider and Sustainable Coastlines to host a large scale cleanup in San Diego that takes the debris collected during the cleanup and turns it into a product(s) to be displayed at the conference.


    Race for Water Foundation, Kim Vanarkel  

     

    This session focuses on how to promote innovative long-term solutions capable of transforming plastic waste into energy in order to prevent plastics from leaking into the ocean.  

     

    Joint action at the global level is urgently needed to address the perils facing our oceans. Our plastic waste to energy model aims at tackling the issue of plastic pollution at the source, by turning off the tap of plastic litter leaking into the ocean. Additionally, our projects will directly improve the health and life of local communities who are often the first victims of this worldwide issue. This session aims to address at federal officials, business leaders, entrepreneurs, government officials, volunteer organizations and investors around our projects. This session will focus on following areas:  

     

    1) Assessment and outcomes: In 2015, Race for Water realized its first Odyssey: an environmental expedition of 300 days which sailed across the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans to assess the state of plastic pollution and highlight its consequences on the populations within the 5 trash vortices.   The first observation was immediately clear: plastic pollution is everywhere. There is no 7th continent, nor plastic island, but a soup of plastic dust in the gyres. A grand-scale clean-up of the ocean is unrealistic, land-based solutions are key to an efficient fight against plastic pollution of our seas.  

     

    2) Plastic waste is the problem as well as the solution: To tackle this terrible issue, we looked at various existing technologies which could create value out of plastic waste in order to incentivize local population to collect it. The requirements in our search were also to minimize the needs for plastic separation and cleaning. We rapidly moved toward energy recovery.  

     

    3) Presentation of the technology: Biogreen® by ETIA Biogreen® is an innovative, patented process for continuous thermochemical conversion of biomass and waste residue that allows torrefaction, pyrolysis and high temperature pyrolysis treatment of various bulk materials.  

     

    This leading-edge technology can recover the high calorific value of plastic litter and convert it into an energy-rich synthesized gas (syngas) applicable to produce electricity, methane and hydrogen.   Compact and modular, the equipment can be containerized and set-up in a few weeks, which makes it easy to integrate locally. Existing machines can process between 5 to 12 tons of plastic waste per day. A plastic waste to energy site can be set with several Biogreen® working in parallel allowing the treatment of higher capacities.  

     

    Biogreen® meets the strictest environmental standards and is CE certified. These small & medium capacities solutions favor decentralized waste management and energy production which are recognized for their efficiency, as well as their social and environmental benefits.   This innovative technological approach demonstrates that remote plastic waste can be an additional resource in energy transition.  

     

    4) Pilot projects towards scalability Currently, in production, the first machine will be delivered in the fall for a 6 months’ testing period to evaluate its performances and assess its environmental footprint. We should be able to share the first results during the 6IMDC. In parallel, proof of concept projects are currently under study for coastal cities and remote islands to showcase the economic model and its social benefits.   By 2025, we wish our model to be replicated worldwide in order to reach sustainable impacts.


    Surfrider Foundation, Stuart Coleman Surfrider Foundation, Bill Hickman  

     

    This presentation is geared toward activists, restaurant owners, customers and all those who are  trying to reduce the pollution from single-use plastic foodware.   

     

    For years, the Surfrider Foundation's extended network of chapters and youth clubs has worked with our non-profit partners to pass many bills to reduce the millions of tons of plastic pollution entering our oceans each year.  Along with passing bill to ban plastic bags, polystyrene foodware and other single-use plastics, we have also developed a new program called Ocean Friendly Restaurants to reduce plastic pollution at its source.  The restaurant industry generates vast amounts of plastic waste, including single-use plastic straws, utensils, plates, cups and many other plastic containers that often end up in our rivers, coastlines and oceans as marine debris. Trying to pass legislative bans can be a long and difficult process that often pits environmentalists against the plastics industry and other businesses.  By contrast, the OFR Program recognizes those restaurants that are voluntarily reducing plastic waste and inefficient uses of energy and water.  In order to be certified as an OFR, food establishments meet the four mandatory criteria (no foam or plastic bags, reusable cups/plates/utensils & proper recycling practices) and three of six other optional criteria. This program offers a win-win-win solution for restaurants, customers and those who are trying to protect the environment. The program was originally launched by Surfrider's San Diego Chapter and soon spread to other regions like Hawaii.  After launching the OFR program on Earth Day 2016, Hawaii's five chapters have certified more than 130 restaurants and received rave reviews from celebrity chefs and the media.  Based on the success in CA, HI and other areas, Surfrider will be taking this program national later this year. This kind of win-win-win scenario could be a model for environmental advocates and everyday customers to work with the private sector to reduce not only plastic waste but also their costs.


    Department of Chemistry, University of Patras, Hrissi K. Karapanagioti

    University of Patreas, Mare Galani

     

    This session is focused to educators and artists as well as scientists can present or observe best practices in performing arts such as dance-theater, dance, music, cinema, drama, etc. and their practice in environmental education and particularly in the topic of marine debris.

     

    The aim of this session is to promote dialogue and research on the contemporary art practice related to performing arts in environmental education with emphasis on marine debris. The objectives of the session is to promote dialogue on each of the topics related to performing arts including dance, theater, dance theater, performance, music, opera, and music theater.   The topics refer to creativity, experimentation, communication, collective action and solidarity, good practices, interdisciplinary, and in general the recent trends in pedagogy and teaching of aesthetic education related to environmental education. Art programs at schools demonstrated that students who participated showed an improvement in communication, interest, and solidarity. Also, performing arts appear to lead to teamwork that leads to character building. Environmental education requires the above skills to reach out to students and inform them and change their behavior in terms of marine debris prevention.


    Blue Frontier, David Helvarg

    Surfrider Foundation, Stuart Coleman

     

    This session is catered to everyone involved in marine debris issues can learn from experienced journalists and media advocates who will critique their presentations and help them sharpen their skills for how they communicate to mainstream media, social media and the general public.

     

    This session  is designed to help facilitate scientists, advocates and others to translate their work into compelling stories that engage and mobilize the broad public audiences needed to change policy, funding and support for addressing marine debris at this critical crossroads in our history.

     

    A panel of experienced environmental journalists and ocean authors, a television news veteran and social media innovator will identify the key elements that attendees need to know and practice to make their findings into emotionally compelling narratives that people can understand and relate to (and therefore act on).

     

    Through a discussion format and using examples from their own works, these leading media figures will offer a set of basic lessons on how to mold and pitch your science and policy findings (as stories) to gatekeeper journalists. They will also provide useful examples of how to build and leverage social media to have both direct impact on engaged online audiences and to have a force multiplier effect on other informational, educational and media outlets.

     

    The last third of the workshop will have attendees “pitch” stories based on their own work – and what they’ve just heard - that will then be critiqued by the panel on how they could be shaped to most effectively reach the broadest possible audiences while maintaining their scientific integrity.

     

    Attendees will leave the workshop with useful notes and a handout sheet on the 10- key lessons they need to remember and practice to become highly effective, ongoing communicators of conservation science related to marine debris.


    Ocean Conservancy, Allison Schutes

     

    This session is aimed to interest anyone (including educators, researchers, industry professionals, and conservationists in the field) who frequently interacts with the general public, such as students or cleanup volunteers, as this session focuses on different methods to deliver concise, intelligible and critical information to large groups in challenging settings.

     

    Ocean trash, while seemingly simple, is an issue that can be complex and even confusing when put into context and scale. Luckily, many organizations have mastered different outreach techniques that leave audiences well-informed, committed to making an impact, and eager to learn more. Understanding the diverse approaches presenters utilize will leave conference attendees equipped with a toolbox of simple ideas, hints, and activities to employ even in the most challenging of scenarios.

     

    In this session we plan to explore examples of outstanding marine debris education programs, materials, and, notably, activities that exemplify diverse geographies, scales and audience levels. Attendees can learn from challenges, trials and successes our colleagues have faced. Is there one perfect outreach strategy that works for all sectors of the field and speaks to all audiences? Probably not, but we can learn from each other's experiences and employ a patchwork of programs, materials and activities that can be tailored for specific educational opportunities.

     

    For Ocean Conservancy, the volunteer cleanup experience through the International Coastal Cleanup and storytelling through debris data are the backbones of the organizations work on the issues. Building off these elements, the Talking Trash & Taking Action marine debris education partnership with the NOAA Marine Debris Program was launched. The program continues to be one of the Trash Free Seas Program's most popular and frequently used resources. In 2016 alone, the program was sent to educators from Maine to Washington to Florida and even Panama. By spotlighting similar and vastly different programs from around the world, attendees and presenters alike will leave better equipped to interface with the general public about the issue of ocean plastics.

     

    Through active demonstrations and moderated panel discussions, we hope to glean information on what's available in terms of marine debris education, elicit best practices, discuss ways to scale and build upon successes, learn from cross-sector programs in speaking to different audiences and explore new ways to share messaging traditionally and digitally.


    Algalita Marine Research and Education, Anika Ballent

    Algalita Marine Research and Education, Katie Allen

     

    This session is focused on using a real-world interdisciplinary approach to education. In order to prepare the next generation to take on the challenges of marine plastic pollution, we must shift the education paradigm to focus on scientific literacy, real-time systemic solutions, and innovations for the future.

     

    Environmental responsibility should be a broadly held value. Fundamental to our existence, it deserves a central place in public education and should be seen as an indicator of social progress. With such importance, why isn’t environmental education being infused into every student’s day?  How can a tangible topic like marine plastic pollution help teachers prepare the next generation to take on the challenges ahead?

     

    By going beyond rhetoric and embracing an interdisciplinary approach, educators of all levels should be encouraged to infuse broad elements of the plastic pollution issue into their curriculum.  Reaching into the social sciences, engineering, design, and beyond, a full understanding of the topic requires exploration from the perspective of many different subjects. This real-world interdisciplinary approach will empower students to tackle the issue through an understanding of real-time systemic sources, barriers, and solutions.

     

    The key to successful environmental education is being able to keep pace with environmental degradation as well as changes in policy, technology, and culture. This seemingly impossible feat can be achieved when teachers and professors build partnerships with organizations that are deeply embedded in all facets of the issue. It is up to the outside organization to design and maintain up-to-date educational resources for teachers to deploy in their classrooms.  Without this support system, educators will continue to teach an ineffective form of environmental education simply because they cannot keep up with the deluge of information necessary to stay informed.

     

    During this session, the group will discuss how organizations can assist educators in becoming learning practitioners who prepare the next generation to address the plastic pollution issue, and other global environmental issues, in the most effective manner – at a systemic level. In addition, we’ll share the importance of designing resources to fit within current educational frameworks including the Next Generation Science Standards. The session will also dive into an evaluation of already existing marine debris educational resources to identify the most effective approaches and needed improvements for support teachers.

     

    The 6th International Conference on Marine Debris needs to be forward-looking. The global understanding of the issue has developed to the point where a focus needs to be put onto quickly employing effective solutions that address the problem at the root. Educating the next generation of scientists, politicians, industry leaders and consumers to be able to address the issue through sustainability, circular economy and an interdisciplinary approach is a vital part of that solution.


    NOAA Marine Debris Program, Krista Stegeman

     

    This session is dedicated to effective marine debris messaging strategies, which are incredibly important for successful and strategic communication, and help achieve the goal of both increasing understanding of the issue and leaving an audience feeling hopeful and empowered to take part in the solution.

     

    Preventing marine debris at its source is the ultimate solution to this pervasive problem and communicating with the public is an important step toward preventing marine debris. However, in order to be effective in your communication, strategic marine debris messaging is incredibly important.

     

    Marine debris can be an easy topic to discuss, since it is tangible and generally simple enough for people to understand. However, it is still a complex topic to talk about and can easily become overly heavy and depressing, leading those you're communicating with feeling overwhelmed and powerless.

     

    This result will not lead to the prevention of marine debris. The goal is for your audience to leave understanding the issue and feeling hopeful and empowered to take part in the solution. To achieve this, we must be strategic in our messaging and avoid being too depressing or aggressive in our communication.

     

    However, the ideal messaging strategy may be different in different circumstances. Cultural and demographic differences may alter what the most effective approach is. This session will focus on marine debris messaging strategies and examples of those strategies in action. The 6IMDC will provide a unique opportunity to hear from marine debris communicators around the world. By better understanding what constitutes effective marine debris messaging in different locations, with different groups of people, and in different circumstances, marine debris communicators will be better able to provide effective messaging.


    Monterey Bay Aquarium/Aquarium Conservation Partnership,Aimee David

    Aquarium Conservation Partnership, Kim McIntyre

     

    This session will focus on the ACP’s consumer campaign to raise public awareness and increase consumer demand for alternatives to single-use plastic, what aquariums are doing to promote science-based policies to reduce sources of aquatic plastic pollution, and how aquariums are working with business partners to model change in our aquariumsand accelerate innovation in the broader marketplace.

     
    The Aquarium Conservation Partnership (ACP) is a first-of-its-kind collaboration of aquariums formed to increase our collective impact on ocean and freshwater conservation. Together, member aquariums work to advance science-based conservation goals by leveraging our unique assets, including our scientific expertise, our visibility with the public, our business relationships, and our credibility with decision makers. The primary goal for 2016-17 is to work together to reduce the sources of ocean and freshwater plastic pollution through a mix of consumer, business, and policy strategies.

     

    The ACP also serves as a “strategic table” for aquariums to take coordinated action on other conservation policy goals, including: increasing ocean and freshwater ecosystem protection; protecting threatened global shark and ray species; and improving the sustainability of fisheries and aquaculture.

     

    This session will focus on the ACP’s consumer campaign raise public awareness and increase consumer demand for alternatives to single-use plastic, what aquariums are doing to promote science-based policies to reduce sources of aquatic plastic pollution, and how aquariums are working with business partners to model change in our aquariums and accelerate innovation in the broader marketplace.


    Sustainable Coastlines Hawaii, Kahi Pacarro

     

    This session looks at ways in providing open source and creating value from marine debris to fund education and removal that reduces its occurrence.

     

    For thousands of years the remnants of giant trees not growing locally have washed ashore in Hawaii. These giant logs represented a gift from the Gods and were crafted into glorious Sailing canoes that endured historical journeys. This marine debris that had drifted thousands of miles to land was reinvented into a treasured vessel revered by Hawaiian civilization. With the recent return from a three year journey around the world, the Sailing Canoe Hokulea reinvigorated the possibilities of taking detritus on the beach and creating value that transcends location and time in order inspire Malama Honua (Taking care of the Earth).

     

    Debris from abroad continues to be delivered to the coastlines of Hawaii but it is no longer looked at as a gift from the Gods nor an opportunity to explore the outer world. But collaborations between Sustainable Coastlines Hawaii, Method Home, Parley for the Oceans, Envision Plastics, Matson, The Polynesian Voyaging Society, ByFusion are aimed at changing that narrative.

     

    Method created the first large scale project of recycling Ocean Plastic aimed at inspiring industry to utilize more post-consumer plastics into their packaging. If they could create a bottle out of degraded Ocean Plastic, others could at least stop using virgin plastic.

     

    Parley for the Oceans took it further and brought a higher value to Ocean Plastic by collaborating with businesses to influence supply chains and products. Funds from sales of products incorporating Ocean Plastic go back to the locations where the debris was removed to further removal and education efforts.

     

    Ocean Plastic has value. Ocean Plastic has a new purpose. Ocean Plastic can be part of the Solution.

     

    The sessions contained within will explore the techniques, logistics, lessons learned, and paths forward to taking what was once looked at as trash on the beach or ocean community and turning it into a valuable commodity. It will focus on local solutions that can be implemented at low cost in remote locations along with tackling large scale projects that bring mass value to the end product through incorporating Ocean Plastic into the manufacturing process.

     

    This session will benefit the conference because it will contain proactive solutions and will provide an open source path forward that anyone can implement upon returning to their community. Moving debris from our coastlines into our landfills represents high risk of reintroduction into the Ocean while incineration gasifies the debris and introduces it back into the atmosphere. Upcycling plastic pollution creates goods needed locally and can create highly desired products that teach valuable lessons that  reach a broader audience far from the Oceans.  Sales of products fund local removal and education efforts while also inspiring better consumer and manufacturer behavior.

     

    Most importantly we will share the ultimate focus how Ocean Plastic can help to reduce consumption, improve local cleanup capacity, and slow the tap of plastics flowing into the oceans through education.

     

    Currently working on creating a collaboration between Surfrider and Sustainable Coastlines to host a large scale cleanup in San Diego that takes the debris collected during the cleanup and turns it into a product(s) to be displayed at the conference.


    Race for Water Foundation, Kim Vanarkel

     

    This session focuses on how to promote innovative long-term solutions capable of transforming plastic waste into energy in order to prevent plastics from leaking into the ocean.

     

    Joint action at the global level is urgently needed to address the perils facing our oceans. Our plastic waste to energy model aims at tackling the issue of plastic pollution at the source, by turning off the tap of plastic litter leaking into the ocean. Additionally, our projects will directly improve the health and life of local communities who are often the first victims of this worldwide issue. This session aims to address at federal officials, business leaders, entrepreneurs, government officials, volunteer organizations and investors around our projects. This session will focus on following areas:

     

    1) Assessment and outcomes:

    In 2015, Race for Water realized its first Odyssey: an environmental expedition of 300 days which sailed across the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans to assess the state of plastic pollution and highlight its consequences on the populations within the 5 trash vortices.

     

    The first observation was immediately clear: plastic pollution is everywhere. There is no 7th continent, nor plastic island, but a soup of plastic dust in the gyres. A grand-scale clean-up of the ocean is unrealistic, land-based solutions are key to an efficient fight against plastic pollution of our seas.

     

    2) Plastic waste is the problem as well as the solution:

    To tackle this terrible issue, we looked at various existing technologies which could create value out of plastic waste in order to incentivize local population to collect it. The requirements in our search were also to minimize the needs for plastic separation and cleaning. We rapidly moved toward energy recovery.

     

    3) Presentation of the technology: Biogreen® by ETIA

    Biogreen® is an innovative, patented process for continuous thermochemical conversion of biomass and waste residue that allows torrefaction, pyrolysis and high temperature pyrolysis treatment of various bulk materials.

     

    This leading-edge technology can recover the high calorific value of plastic litter and convert it into an energy-rich synthesized gas (syngas) applicable to produce electricity, methane and hydrogen.

     

    Compact and modular, the equipment can be containerized and set-up in a few weeks, which makes it easy to integrate locally. Existing machines can process between 5 to 12 tons of plastic waste per day. A plastic waste to energy site can be set with several Biogreen® working in parallel allowing the treatment of higher capacities.

     

    Biogreen® meets the strictest environmental standards and is CE certified. These small & medium capacities solutions favor decentralized waste management and energy production which are recognized for their efficiency, as well as their social and environmental benefits.

     

    This innovative technological approach demonstrates that remote plastic waste can be an additional resource in energy transition.

     

    4) Pilot projects towards scalability

    Currently, in production, the first machine will be delivered in the fall for a 6 months’ testing period to evaluate its performances and assess its environmental footprint. We should be able to share the first results during the 6IMDC. In parallel, proof of concept projects are currently under study for coastal cities and remote islands to showcase the economic model and its social benefits.

     

    By 2025, we wish our model to be replicated worldwide in order to reach sustainable impacts.


    Surfrider Foundation, Stuart Coleman

    Surfrider Foundation, Bill Hickman

     

    This presentation is geared toward activists, restaurant owners, customers and all those who are  trying to reduce the pollution from single-use plastic foodware. 

     

    For years, the Surfrider Foundation's extended network of chapters and youth clubs has worked with our non-profit partners to pass many bills to reduce the millions of tons of plastic pollution entering our oceans each year.  Along with passing bill to ban plastic bags, polystyrene foodware and other single-use plastics, we have also developed a new program called Ocean Friendly Restaurants to reduce plastic pollution at its source.  The restaurant industry generates vast amounts of plastic waste, including single-use plastic straws, utensils, plates, cups and many other plastic containers that often end up in our rivers, coastlines and oceans as marine debris. Trying to pass legislative bans can be a long and difficult process that often pits environmentalists against the plastics industry and other businesses.  By contrast, the OFR Program recognizes those restaurants that are voluntarily reducing plastic waste and inefficient uses of energy and water.  In order to be certified as an OFR, food establishments meet the four mandatory criteria (no foam or plastic bags, reusable cups/plates/utensils & proper recycling practices) and three of six other optional criteria. This program offers a win-win-win solution for restaurants, customers and those who are trying to protect the environment. The program was originally launched by Surfrider's San Diego Chapter and soon spread to other regions like Hawaii.  After launching the OFR program on Earth Day 2016, Hawaii's five chapters have certified more than 130 restaurants and received rave reviews from celebrity chefs and the media.  Based on the success in CA, HI and other areas, Surfrider will be taking this program national later this year. This kind of win-win-win scenario could be a model for environmental advocates and everyday customers to work with the private sector to reduce not only plastic waste but also their costs.


    NOAA Marine Debris Program, Jason Rolfe

     

    This session will focus on developing and implementing local, state, or regional action plans and session participants will learn about the planning and implementation process as well as remaining challenges.

     

    Marine debris is a chronic and persistent problem around the world and we know that simply removing debris from the environment is not a long-term solution. In many coastal regions, marine debris action plans are a vital step to prevent and reduce marine debris. Action plans represent a compilation of recommended strategies and actions to prevent, research, and remove marine debris in a specific geography. Action plans are the culmination of collaborative efforts of federal and state agencies, tribes, local governments, non-governmental organizations, academia, and industry. The action plan development process brings together the entities working on marine debris to increase coordination and collaboration in executing on-going and future actions, and to help track progress over time.

     

    Building off recommendations from the Honolulu Strategy, numerous action plans have been developed or are currently being developed around the globe. Despite all the effort to develop action plans, many challenges remain. Presentations in this session will highlight particularly successful goals and strategies to address priority marine debris issues including those that focus on derelict fishing gear and aquaculture debris, wildlife and habitat impacts, abandoned or derelict vessels, emergency response, and consumer debris.  Participants will hear about the successes and challenges in developing an action plan and will learn valuable information on how to develop and implement successful plans for their region.

     


    WILDCOAST, Angela Kemsley

    San Diego Zoo- Institute for Conservation Research, Samantha Young

     

    In this session professions from WILDCOAST, the San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, and their partners will provide conservation educators, scientists, and enforcement officials with tools to leverage the power of bottom-up, experiential, and community-based conservation projects that will clean up southwest United States and northwest Mexico and protect the ecosystem, habitats, and species within.

     

    The southwest United States and northwest Mexico provide a unique opportunity to comparatively study and practice conservation techniques. Southern California and norther Mexico share many of the same of the same species and populations, thereby creating mutual conservation issues between the two regions. Despite these similarities, the cultural, economic, and political systems of these two regions are vastly different presenting unique challenges when engaging communities in conservation.

     

    In the past, conservation projects, especially in Mexico, have focused on excluding locals as community members themselves were often seen as part of the problem. These “fortress conservation” method has been shown to fail for when projects ignore the livelihoods of cultural traditions of a community, members may become resistant to efforts and have even resorted to sabotage and violence. Recognizing the importance of community engagement and building support for conservation projects from the bottom up, recent projects have been working to reconcile conservation and community by including community participation in an integral part of the conservation plan.

     

    This session will bring together experts in the field of community-based conservation from projects both in the southwest United States and northwest Mexico. Specifically, this session will highlight the international work being done by WILDCOAST, a nonprofit, international team that conserves coastal and marine ecosystems and wildlife in the United States, Mexico, Cuba and the San Diego Zoo Global Institute for Conservation Research, and their partners.


    Department of Geology, University of Patras, George Papatheodorou

    University of Patras, Hrissi Karapanagioti

     

    This session is focused on marine debris scientists dealing with environmental degradation and floating, beached and benthic plastic litter.

     

    Plastics are ubiquitous in the marine environment and present even on the most remote areas of the planet. The boom in the global plastic production is reached up to 280 million tons in 2012. The imprudent use of plastics in our everyday life has elevated plastics into a major environmental threat. The generated plastic waste in 192 coastal countries in 2010, has been estimated at approximately 275 million metric tons (MT), from which 4.8–12.7 million MT have entered the oceans. For the synthetic polymers, the degradation process starts once they are deposited into the oceans, mainly due to the synergistic effect of environmental variables and the inherent material instability. Nonetheless, the degradation rate of the polymers is significantly slow, which makes them extremely persistent. Thus, plastics can last in the marine environment for decades or even hundreds of years when in surface; likely far longer when in deep sea.

     

    Most synthetic polymers (polyethylene, polypropylene) are buoyant in waters while other (high-density polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate) may sink. The torpid degradation of the large plastic items, will result in the formation of small fragments (< 5 mm); microplastics. Both plastics and microplastics have adverse effects on the marine biota. They may collocate with microorganisms, invertebrates and microbial communities, and even form plastiglomerates. Although there are many studies on the degradation of plastic in the laboratory by polymer scientists there are only limited studies on the environmental degradation of plastic in the marine and coastal environment.  This session will address topics on identification and characterization of plastic, determination of the alterations, identification of possible mechanisms of degradation, dating of plastics and estimation of lifetime of plastics in the environment. This session will accept studies based on samples from field surveys and also studies from laboratory experiments. However, priority will be given to studies that provide characterization of plastic samples collected from the field.


    German Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Stefanie Werner

    OSPAR Commision, John Mouat

     

    This session will discuss the current status and trends in amounts and composition of marine litter in the North East Atlantic and what can be done to prevent further introductions and reduce levels.

     

    The North East Atlantic has a diverse marine environment, with a wide range of human activities (e.g. fishing, shipping, aquaculture and offshore oil and gas) and a high coastal population. This has led to levels of marine litter that OSPAR (Convention for the Protection of the North East Atlantic) Ministers highlighted as unacceptable in 2010. In the following years OSPAR has put in place a monitoring programme to assess levels and trends of marine litter on beaches, the seabed and in biota. In 2014 OSPAR adopted a Regional Action Plan (RAP) on marine litter, as called for at the 5th IMDC, and to address its commitment to "substantially reduce marine litter in the OSPAR Maritime Area to levels where properties and quantities do not cause harm to the marine environment" as also required by the Marine Strategy Framework Directive to be achieved by 2020.

     

    The Regional Action Plan sets out 31 common and 23 individual (national) actions that OSPAR Contracting Parties should take to prevent and reduce marine litter which address the relevant sea- and land-based sources as well as education and outreach.

     

    This session will focus on two elements: the current state and trends in marine litter in the North East Atlantic based on recent OSPAR assessments and what further work is needed on monitoring; and the implementation of the OSPAR Regional Action Plan, what has been achieved so far and what more needs to be done to prevent further inputs and reduce levels of marine litter.

     

    Monitoring is key not only of assessing quantities,       trends and impacts of marine litter but also in identifying top items that should be addressed by dedicated measures. In 2017 OSPAR assessed three indicators on beach litter, seabed litter and plastic particles in fulmars' stomachs. However gaps in the monitoring programme remain and further indicators are being developed on microplastics and plastic particles in biota. The session will present these assessments and discuss how monitoring can be further improved.

     

    The Regional Action Plan covers key marine litter issues such as port reception facilities, waste from the fishing industry, fines for littering at sea, fishing for litter, ALDFG, floating litter hotspots, improved waste management, sewage stormwater runoff, reduction of single use items, reduction of microplastics use and emissions and redesign of harmful products. Many actions are underway to tackle these issues,h owever further work is needed to fully implement the actions. The session will discuss the challenges and way forward for implementing regional actions plans, including possibilities for cooperation and how they link to other regional and international legislation and other processes.


    Northwest Pacific Action Plan, UN Environment, Lev Neretin

    UN Environment, Keith Alverson

     

    The session will showcase good practices in governance and management of marine litter flows using "source-to-sea" framework from the local to the regional scale in the Northwest Pacific region (Japan, P.R. China, R. Korea, and the Russian Federation)

     

    Existing governance and management frameworks applied to environmental protection and sustainable development on land are often disconnected from those addressing impacts of these activities in the coastal and marine environment, thus undermining efforts to promote sustainability. The “source-to-sea” (S2S) conceptual framework provides a useful guidance to assess and design initiatives that work to achieve greater sustainability in the S2S continuum, including management of marine litter problem (Granit et al., 2017). S2S systems addressing key flows such as marine litter flows need governance arrangements that balance economic development objectives across sectors and are capable of coordinating and integrating across various management objectives.

     

    The session will be designed to showcase good practices in governance and management of marine litter flows in the S2S continuum at various scales (sub-national, national and regional) using examples from the Northwest Pacific countries (Japan, P.R. China, R. Korea, and the Russian Federation). Session’s structure will follow S2S conceptual framework when applied to marine litter flows by addressing the following topics:

     

    - Characterize the current situation of marine litter (distribution and impacts), including microplastics, pollution in the Northwest Pacific region;

     

    - Identify major drivers of marine litter pollution and sectors responsible, including unsustainable consumption and production practices;

     

    - Showcase successes and lessons learned in establishing enabling environment (case studies of city level marine litter management plans, national strategies and plans addressing marine litter, sustainable waste management practices, circular economy and R&D on plastics alternatives, NOWPAP Regional Action Plan on Marine Litter and other regional efforts);

     

    - Showcase strategies and practices that resulted in measurable changes in behavior among institutions, stakeholders, and redirection of investment flows;

     

    - Highlight ongoing efforts in integration of marine litter governance framework into sustainable development strategies and plans. This segment would consider ongoing efforts in mainstreaming various approaches addressing marine litter, including ecosystem-based management, waste management, promotion of circular economy, and research and development into materials and alternatives into sustainable development frameworks. One such example is the National Strategy for Green Growth (2009-2050) of the Republic of Korea.

     

    At the end the session will identify a set of recommendations that can be taken onboard by governments, private sector, NGOs and academia in addressing marine litter issues holistically using S2S framework that would contribute ultimately to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goal SDG 14 and other related SDGs.


    French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER), Francois Galgani

    Federal Environment Agency, Germany Stefano Werner, MSFD George Hanke

    EU Commission, Matjaz Malgaj

    EU Commision Michel Sponar

     

    The session will address the different EU legislative instruments and policy initiatives to combat marine litter; furthermore explanation will be provided on how the science - policy interface is derived in order to provide the technical advice required for their implementation.

     

    The European Union (EU) is tackling the plastic and microplastics marine pollution already through the implementation of marine environment, waste management and port reception facilities legislation. Moreover, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), LIFE, H2020 and other EU funds support and promote scientific research and technological development on harm caused by litter and microplastics, also considering human health. The Directive for reducing consumption of plastic bags is a key measure for addressing an emblematic source of marine litter. Policies applying extended producer responsibility (EPR) have also a role to play as part of a broader approach to avoid waste arising in the first place and then generating revenues for properly dealing with the waste produced. A Strategy for Plastics will be presented by the EU Commission in 2017 addressing, inter alia, leakages of plastic waste and microplastics to the marine environment; the EU Communication "An Agenda for the future of our ocean" from November 2016 will strengthen international action against marine litter.

     

    According to the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), the Member States of the EU must ensure that properties and quantities of marine litter should not cause harm to the coastal and marine environment. EU and its Member States are coordinating closely with their neighbours within the Regional seas Conventions around Europe and, at global level, with UN initiatives.

     

    The technical support to these initiatives is largely provided by the MSFD Technical Group on Marine Litter (TGML). New developments for the implementation of the MSFD for the descriptor 10 (marine litter) have now to be considered, aiming at a better definition of Good Environmental Status (GES), updating monitoring protocols, implementing the monitoring of new indicators such as entanglement, defining baselines and targets for better monitoring the  efficiency of reduction measures, and finally identify new research needs.  This session will address all these questions and consider the following topics:

     

    -  EU policy framework for land- and sea-based sources of marine litter

    -  Good environmental status with regard to marine litter

    -  EPR implementation in EU and global prospects

    -  EU contribution in international collaboration to fight marine litter

    -  Scientific and technological development, innovation and cooperation

    -  Involvement of the civil society and citizen's science

    -  Financial tools and investment opportunities

    -  Monitoring of marine Litter and related impacts within MSFD


    Dalhousie University, Dr. Tony R. Walker

    Scout Environmental, Dirk Zanthos

     

    This session will review the current state of policies and legislation regarding phasing out or banning microplastics and explore strategies for advancing further reductions or bans.

     

    Plastics are now ubiquitous in the marine environment. While researchers have noted the problem of plastics in the marine environment since the 1970’s, the issue of marine plastic pollution has only recently been identified as an issue of global significance. Microplastics (defined as plastic fragments less than 5mm) contribute significantly to this marine pollution. Microplastics can travel great distances floating or suspended seawater, and become incorporated in sediment or stranded on beaches. Single-use plastics, such as plastic bags and microbeads, are a significant source of microplastics in the marine environment.

     

    Research has highlighted that plastics have significant environmental, social, and economic impacts. Despite overwhelming evidence of the threat of plastic in the marine environment, there remains inadequate or limited policies to address their mitigation, particularly microplastic debris. Further, few studies have examined policy and legislative tools to reduce plastic pollution, particularly single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads). While policies to reduce microbeads began in 2014, interventions for plastic bags began much earlier in 1991. In this session, current international market-based strategies and policies to reduce plastic bags and microbeads will be reviewed.       After identifying the current state of play, the session will provide recommendations for improved practises and policies. This will include recommendations for (1) law and waste management strategies; (2) education, outreach and awareness; (3) source identification; and (4) increased monitoring and further research.

     

    Finally, the session will intend to highlight current advocacy efforts for the advancement of microplastic policy and legislation, with the aim of providing direction for individuals to advance such changes in their own regions.


    EOA, Inc, Chris Sommers

     

    Guidance to individuals from other states and the international community from municipalities, regulatory agencies, non-governmental organizations, and researchers in California (USA) based on their 15+ year journey to implement management actions focused on significantly reducing on-land sources of trash/litter and monitoring improvements in trash-impacted waterways.

     

    Since the late 1990's, the State of California has recognized that trash/litter is significantly impacting recreational uses and wildlife habitat in streams, rivers, lakes, estuaries and the Pacific Ocean. Numerous waterways throughout the State are now considered water quality "impaired" via the Federal Clean Water Act due to the amount of trash present in them. These impairment determinations have spawned numerous regulatory and management actions throughout the State that are designed to significantly reduce the amount of trash items reaching waterways. These include regulatory mandates on cities, counties and other public agencies and industries to reduce the impacts that trash originating from on-land sources is having on fisheries, wildlife and recreational uses. Municipalities in the Los Angeles and San Francisco Bay regions have been the leaders in developing and implementing new technologies and controls to prevent the on-land generation of trash, intercept it before it reaches waterways, and cleanup trash once it reaches these important natural resources. To-date, hundreds-of-millions of dollars have been spent by California municipalities on reducing the impacts of trash on waterways, and millions more will be spent over the next decade to combat this pervasive pollutant. Additional efforts to further the development of trash monitoring and assessment methods are also currently underway in attempts to measure the effectiveness of management actions and the progress being made towards achieving trash reduction goals.

     

    This session will assemble key players throughout California that that are pioneers in developing trash reduction regulations, adopting source control actions such as plastic bag and expanded polystyrene bans, developing innovative technologies to intercept trash, implementing novel litter reduction strategies, and measuring progress over time.  The session will include presentations from water quality regulators, municipalities, non-governmental organizations, and researchers in California on their experiences and lessons learned over the last 15-plus years. The session will conclude with a facilitated panel discussion, and question and answer session. The overall goal of the session will be to share the "California Experience" with attendees, on the sources of on-land trash, the successful and not so successful management actions, and practical methods used to monitor improvements.


    Love A Clean San Diego, Natalie Roberts DeCarli

    California Coastal Commission, Eben Schwartz

     

    State and local organizers of International Coastal Cleanup Day will discuss all levels of event coordination, including data collection and its impact on the community, best practices, and innovative strategies for the event. 

     

    I Love A Clean San Diego (ILACSD), the California Coastal Commission (CCC), and other partners will join together on a panel to discuss International Coastal Cleanup Day coordination from their unique perspectives. State and local experts on the coordination of the event will cover the process of planning the event at all levels. This would include conversations on the data collection process, how the data has been used to encourage different municipalities to establish regulations that reduce the amount of marine litter, innovative ideas for the event, and the benefit of forming a constituency of volunteers that will arise to call for more to be done in their jurisdictions.

     

    ILACSD coordinates San Diego County’s Coastal Cleanup Day, averaging 110 unique cleanup sites, including sites in Tijuana, with 10,000 volunteers who remove 170,000 pounds of trash and debris each year. Over three quarters of these sites are inland sites, spreading awareness of how debris travels through the watershed and makes it way to our coast. With 32 years of experience planning the event, the organization has also done more to make the cleanup itself more ocean friendly by incorporating zero waste cleanups and the “Bling Your Bucket” contest, to encourage volunteers to bring reusable cleanup items. With these incentives, ILACSD has seen 75% of volunteers pledge to bring at least one reusable item to the cleanup, reducing the amount of plastic waste created by the event. San Diego County is a part of the more than 1,000 sites in California overseen by the Coastal Commission, which since the event began in 1985, has helped activate over 1.4 million volunteers, who have removed over 23 million pounds of trash from our beaches and inland waterways.

     

    The data and volunteerism from Coastal Cleanup Day has been instrumental in changing mindsets on the causes and impacts of marine debris. California passed a statewide ban on plastic bags in 2014 (that was upheld in 2016), due in part to how environmental organizations have educated the public on the dangers of plastic bags in our ocean and the abundance of plastic bags in litter found at the beaches. For the first time in a decade, plastic bags were not in the top ten items of debris found during the September event. The timing indicates that this is not just due to the ban on plastic bags, but also to the change in mindset as more people see the harm that plastic does to the environment first hand. Coastal Cleanup Day can ignite passion for new environmental stewards, encouraging a yearlong commitment to our open spaces and ocean. This panel will demonstrate the value of the cleanup to other nations that do not currently participate and share innovations and best practices for those that already do.

     


    NOAA Marine Debris Program, Nir Barnea

     

    This session will highlight Participants involved with abandoned and derelict vessels (ADV) prevention and removal will learn about ADV programs, case studies, best practices, and remaining challenges.

     

    Abandoned and Derelict Vessels (ADVs) are a dangerous and costly global problem. ADVs obstruct navigational channels, damage ecosystems, and diminish the recreational value of the surrounding area. Some ADVs may contain fuel and hazardous materials, which could leak into the surrounding water. ADV removal is often complicated and expensive, with some vessels located in hard-to-reach areas, requiring large, specialized equipment for recovery and transportation. The wreckage may persist for years, breaking apart and creating widespread debris that threatens marine and coastal resources.

     

    Over the years, programs were developed in the US and worldwide to prevent and remove ADVs. Legislation supported agencies’ effort to tackle the ADV problem; Vessels-turn-in programs enticed owners to hand over their dilapidated boats before they sunk; and when removal became necessary, collaborative efforts of agencies, industry, and NGOs made removal as cost effective as possible. Despite all the effort, big challenges remain. Presentations of best management practices, case studies, lessons learned, and successes and challenges will provide this session's participants with valuable information on how to best tackle the ADV problem in their area.

     

    In the past, conservation projects, especially in Mexico, have focused on excluding locals as community members themselves were often seen as part of the problem. These “fortress conservation” method has been shown to fail for when projects ignore the livelihoods of cultural traditions of a community, members may become resistant to efforts and have even resorted to sabotage and violence. Recognizing the importance of community engagement and building support for conservation projects from the bottom up, recent projects have been working to reconcile conservation and community by including community participation in an integral part of the conservation plan.

     

    This session will bring together experts in the field of community-based conservation from projects both in the southwest United States and northwest Mexico. Specifically, this session will highlight the international work being done by WILDCOAST, a nonprofit, international team that conserves coastal and marine ecosystems and wildlife in the United States, Mexico, Cuba and the San Diego Zoo Global Institute for Conservation Research, and their partners.


    Sitka Sound Science Center, Victoria OConnell

    Tribal Government of St. Paul Island, Pamela Lestenkof

     

    In this session, you'll hear from community members actively working to remove marine debris from rugged remote areas and the unique challenges they face with removal and costs of shipping to recycling/disposal facilities on mainland Alaska and the Lower 48.

     

    Removal and disposal of marine debris from remote Alaskan communities poses many challenges.       Along with the rugged terrain, some of these challenges include working in the sub-arctic environment and inclement marine weather. One of the main challenges is timing marine debris removal efforts around the retreat of sea ice from the shoreline with the arrival of nesting seabirds and marine mammals. This window of opportunity to remove debris from the shoreline is limited to spring, summer, and fall months. Additionally, being from remote communities poses logistical challenges for debris disposal. Most municipal landfills do not accept marine debris; therefore all debris collected must be shipped to mainland Alaska or the Lower 48 for disposal or recycling. The logistics and challenges of marine debris removal and disposal from small remote communities from the Bering Sea to Southeast Alaska will be explored further in this session.


    I Love A Clean San Diego, Moriah Saldana


    California Coastal Commission, Eben Schwartz

     

    State and local organizers of International Coastal Cleanup Day will discuss all levels of event coordination, including data collection and its impact on the community, best practices, and innovative strategies for the event. 

     

    I Love A Clean San Diego (ILACSD), the California Coastal Commission (CCC), and other partners will join together on a panel to discuss International Coastal Cleanup Day coordination from their unique perspectives. State and local experts on the coordination of the event will cover the process of planning the event at all levels. This would include conversations on the data collection process, how the data has been used to encourage different municipalities to establish regulations that reduce the amount of marine litter, innovative ideas for the event, and the benefit of forming a constituency of volunteers that will arise to call for more to be done in their jurisdictions. 

     

    ILACSD coordinates San Diego County’s Coastal Cleanup Day, averaging 110 unique cleanup sites, including sites in Tijuana, with 10,000 volunteers who remove 170,000 pounds of trash and debris each year. Over three quarters of these sites are inland sites, spreading awareness of how debris travels through the watershed and makes it way to our coast. With 32 years of experience planning the event, the organization has also done more to make the cleanup itself more ocean friendly by incorporating zero waste cleanups and the “Bling Your Bucket” contest, to encourage volunteers to bring reusable cleanup items. With these incentives, ILACSD has seen 75% of volunteers pledge to bring at least one reusable item to the cleanup, reducing the amount of plastic waste created by the event. San Diego County is a part of the more than 1,000 sites in California overseen by the Coastal Commission, which since the event began in 1985, has helped activate over 1.4 million volunteers, who have removed over 23 million pounds of trash from our beaches and inland waterways.

     

    The data and volunteerism from Coastal Cleanup Day has been instrumental in changing mindsets on the causes and impacts of marine debris. California passed a statewide ban on plastic bags in 2014 (that was upheld in 2016), due in part to how environmental organizations have educated the public on the dangers of plastic bags in our ocean and the abundance of plastic bags in litter found at the beaches. For the first time in a decade, plastic bags were not in the top ten items of debris found during the September event. The timing indicates that this is not just due to the ban on plastic bags, but also to the change in mindset as more people see the harm that plastic does to the environment first hand. Coastal Cleanup Day can ignite passion for new environmental stewards, encouraging a yearlong commitment to our open spaces and ocean. This panel will demonstrate the value of the cleanup to other nations that do not currently participate and share innovations and best practices for those that already do.


    Northwest Pacific Action Plan, UN Environment, Lev Neretin

    UN Environment, Keith Alverson

    The session will showcase good practices in governance and management of marine litter flows using "source-to-sea" framework from the local to the regional scale in the Northwest Pacific region (Japan, P.R. China, R. Korea, and the Russian Federation)

     

    Existing governance and management frameworks applied to environmental protection and sustainable development on land are often disconnected from those addressing impacts of these activities in the coastal and marine environment, thus undermining efforts to promote sustainability. The “source-to-sea” (S2S) conceptual framework provides a useful guidance to assess and design initiatives that work to achieve greater sustainability in the S2S continuum, including management of marine litter problem (Granit et al., 2017). S2S systems addressing key flows such as marine litter flows need governance arrangements that balance economic development objectives across sectors and are capable of coordinating and integrating across various management objectives.

    The session will be designed to showcase good practices in governance and management of marine litter flows in the S2S continuum at various scales (sub-national, national and regional) using examples from the Northwest Pacific countries (Japan, P.R. China, R. Korea, and the Russian Federation). Session’s structure will follow S2S conceptual framework when applied to marine litter flows by addressing the following topics:

    - Characterize the current situation of marine litter (distribution and impacts), including microplastics, pollution in the Northwest Pacific region;

    - Identify major drivers of marine litter pollution and sectors responsible, including unsustainable consumption and production practices;

    - Showcase successes and lessons learned in establishing enabling environment (case studies of city level marine litter management plans, national strategies and plans addressing marine litter, sustainable waste management practices, circular economy and R&D on plastics alternatives, NOWPAP Regional Action Plan on Marine Litter and other regional efforts);

    - Showcase strategies and practices that resulted in measurable changes in behavior among institutions, stakeholders, and redirection of investment flows;

    - Highlight ongoing efforts in integration of marine litter governance framework into sustainable development strategies and plans. This segment would consider ongoing efforts in mainstreaming various approaches addressing marine litter, including ecosystem-based management, waste management, promotion of circular economy, and research and development into materials and alternatives into sustainable development frameworks. One such example is the National Strategy for Green Growth (2009-2050) of the Republic of Korea.

    At the end the session will identify a set of recommendations that can be taken onboard by governments, private sector, NGOs and academia in addressing marine litter issues holistically using S2S framework that would contribute ultimately to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goal SDG 14 and other related SDGs.


    French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER), Francois Galgani

    Federal Environment Agency, Germany Stefano Werner, MSFD George Hanke

    EU Commission, Matjaz Malgaj

    EU Commision Michel Sponar

     

    The session will address the different EU legislative instruments and policy initiatives to combat marine litter; furthermore explanation will be provided on how the science - policy interface is derived in order to provide the technical advice required for their implementation.

     

    The European Union (EU) is tackling the plastic and microplastics marine pollution already through the implementation of marine environment, waste management and port reception facilities legislation. Moreover, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), LIFE, H2020 and other EU funds support and promote scientific research and technological development on harm caused by litter and microplastics, also considering human health. The Directive for reducing consumption of plastic bags is a key measure for addressing an emblematic source of marine litter. Policies applying extended producer responsibility (EPR) have also a role to play as part of a broader approach to avoid waste arising in the first place and then generating revenues for properly dealing with the waste produced. A Strategy for Plastics will be presented by the EU Commission in 2017 addressing, inter alia, leakages of plastic waste and microplastics to the marine environment; the EU Communication "An Agenda for the future of our ocean" from November 2016 will strengthen international action against marine litter.

     

    According to the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), the Member States of the EU must ensure that properties and quantities of marine litter should not cause harm to the coastal and marine environment. EU and its Member States are coordinating closely with their neighbours within the Regional seas Conventions around Europe and, at global level, with UN initiatives.

     

    The technical support to these initiatives is largely provided by the MSFD Technical Group on Marine Litter (TGML). New developments for the implementation of the MSFD for the descriptor 10 (marine litter) have now to be considered, aiming at a better definition of Good Environmental Status (GES), updating monitoring protocols, implementing the monitoring of new indicators such as entanglement, defining baselines and targets for better monitoring the  efficiency of reduction measures, and finally identify new research needs.  This session will address all these questions and consider the following topics:

    -  EU policy framework for land- and sea-based sources of marine litter

    -  Good environmental status with regard to marine litter

    -  EPR implementation in EU and global prospects

    -  EU contribution in international collaboration to fight marine litter

    -  Scientific and technological development, innovation and cooperation

    -  Involvement of the civil society and citizen's science

    -  Financial tools and investment opportunities

    -  Monitoring of marine Litter and related impacts within MSFD


    Dalhousie University, Dr. Tony R. Walker

    Scout Environmental, Dirk Zanthos

     

    This session will review the current state of policies and legislation regarding phasing out or banning microplastics and explore strategies for advancing further reductions or bans.

     

    Plastics are now ubiquitous in the marine environment. While researchers have noted the problem of plastics in the marine environment since the 1970’s, the issue of marine plastic pollution has only recently been identified as an issue of global significance. Microplastics (defined as plastic fragments less than 5mm) contribute significantly to this marine pollution. Microplastics can travel great distances floating or suspended seawater, and become incorporated in sediment or stranded on beaches. Single-use plastics, such as plastic bags and microbeads, are a significant source of microplastics in the marine environment.

     

    Research has highlighted that plastics have significant environmental, social, and economic impacts. Despite overwhelming evidence of the threat of plastic in the marine environment, there remains inadequate or limited policies to address their mitigation, particularly microplastic debris. Further, few studies have examined policy and legislative tools to reduce plastic pollution, particularly single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads). While policies to reduce microbeads began in 2014, interventions for plastic bags began much earlier in 1991. In this session, current international market-based strategies and policies to reduce plastic bags and microbeads will be reviewed.       After identifying the current state of play, the session will provide recommendations for improved practises and policies. This will include recommendations for (1) law and waste management strategies; (2) education, outreach and awareness; (3) source identification; and (4) increased monitoring and further research.

     

    Finally, the session will intend to highlight current advocacy efforts for the advancement of microplastic policy and legislation, with the aim of providing direction for individuals to advance such changes in their own regions.


    EOA, Inc, Chris Sommers

    Guidance to individuals from other states and the international community from municipalities, regulatory agencies, non-governmental organizations, and researchers in California (USA) based on their 15+ year journey to implement management actions focused on significantly reducing on-land sources of trash/litter and monitoring improvements in trash-impacted waterways.

    Since the late 1990's, the State of California has recognized that trash/litter is significantly impacting recreational uses and wildlife habitat in streams, rivers, lakes, estuaries and the Pacific Ocean. Numerous waterways throughout the State are now considered water quality "impaired" via the Federal Clean Water Act due to the amount of trash present in them. These impairment determinations have spawned numerous regulatory and management actions throughout the State that are designed to significantly reduce the amount of trash items reaching waterways. These include regulatory mandates on cities, counties and other public agencies and industries to reduce the impacts that trash originating from on-land sources is having on fisheries, wildlife and recreational uses. Municipalities in the Los Angeles and San Francisco Bay regions have been the leaders in developing and implementing new technologies and controls to prevent the on-land generation of trash, intercept it before it reaches waterways, and cleanup trash once it reaches these important natural resources. To-date, hundreds-of-millions of dollars have been spent by California municipalities on reducing the impacts of trash on waterways, and millions more will be spent over the next decade to combat this pervasive pollutant. Additional efforts to further the development of trash monitoring and assessment methods are also currently underway in attempts to measure the effectiveness of management actions and the progress being made towards achieving trash reduction goals.

     

    This session will assemble key players throughout California that that are pioneers in developing trash reduction regulations, adopting source control actions such as plastic bag and expanded polystyrene bans, developing innovative technologies to intercept trash, implementing novel litter reduction strategies, and measuring progress over time.  The session will include presentations from water quality regulators, municipalities, non-governmental organizations, and researchers in California on their experiences and lessons learned over the last 15-plus years. The session will conclude with a facilitated panel discussion, and question and answer session. The overall goal of the session will be to share the "California Experience" with attendees, on the sources of on-land trash, the successful and not so successful management actions, and practical methods used to monitor improvements.

    This session track will address the achievements and lessons learned in implementing single-use product policies, regulations, and laws. Topics include the following and more: successes and Challenges of Single Use Product Regulatory Efforts from Across the U.S. and internationally; Best Practices, Strategies and Lessons Learned on Single Use Product Campaigns; and local, State and Federal Ocean Single Use Product Laws (microbeads, bags, can lids, polystyrene); and Case Studies from Municipalities, Regional multilateral agencies, and organizations from around the world.


    The 5 Gyres Institute, Anna Cummins

    The Lonely Whale Foundation, Dune Ives

     

    Engaging NGOs, policymakers, and advocates in an exploration of best practices and lessons learned around corporate and regulatory product campaigns.

     

    NGOS, policymakers, and advocates have worked together over the last few decades on product-specific source reduction through both regulatory and corporate facing campaigns to address particularly problematic items – plastic bags, microbeads, and polystyrene to name a few. Several of these product campaigns have resulted in legislative outcomes – the California and Hawaii statewide bans on plastic bag, the Federal ban on microbeads, as well as numerous municipal policies directed at sources reduction around the country. But non-legislative campaigns have also lead to successful initiatives – such as Ikea’s and McDonald’s phasing out of polystyrene, and restaurants around the country switching to paper straws and recyclable/compostable packaging. What can we learn about these success, failures, challenges, and outcomes going forward to better inform plastic waste reduction campaigns? This panel will feature experts from both the legislative/policy perspective, and the corporate engagement sector, to share case studies, best practices, strategy, and engage the audience in a discussion around collaborative future approaches.


    Heal the Bay, Sarah Abramson Sikich

    PlasticbagLaws, Jennie Romer

     

    Using California as a case study, experts from a variety of disciplines will discuss how California went from a state with a few local bag ordinances to the first state in the nation with a comprehensive single-use bag policy, with the goal of discussing legislative strategies for marine debris source reduction with conference attendees.

     

    The goal of this panel is to showcase the decade-long process it took California to go from a state with a few municipal plastic bag ban ordinances to the first state in the nation with a comprehensive single-use carryout bag law. Panelists will discuss opportunities, challenges, policy evolution, and pivot points that led to eventual passage of Proposition 67 in 2016 – the referendum that upheld California’s plastic bag ban and paper bag surcharge. The panelists are leaders in a range of sectors, including legal, environmental non-profit, business, education, and government. Each has a unique lens by which they engaged in the pathway to a plastic bag free California, and will provide critical commentary and insights on the roles that various stakeholders play in environmental campaigns, using Proposition 67 as a case study. The dialogue will engage with its audience to discuss strategy and work through opportunities and challenges that areas outside of California may face in advancing source reduction strategies for marine debris.


    Zero Waste USA, Ruth Abbe

    Save the Albatross, Richard Anthony

     

    The audience will learn concrete strategies for making positive change to reduce marine debris (such as bottle caps) through outreach, education, and public policy initiatives.

     

    We have all seen the pictures of dead albatross chicks with their bellies full of plastics (including mostly bottle caps). We can help raise awareness and identify solutions! How?

     

    For nearly 20 years, the Algalita Education Foundation has been searching for answers on plastic pollution in the marine ecosystem. Algalita joined the Albatross Coalition to promote grassroots strategies to stop plastic pollution at the source. The Bottle Cap Awareness project builds on our ongoing work. They sponsor beach cleanups with community organizations, school groups, and service organizations in their local area in Long Beach. They also use beach cleanups to educate their corporate partners about the types of materials that end up on our beaches. This year, in cooperation with the Albatross Coalition, they encouraged their participants to separate bottle caps from the other materials that they collect and talked to them about the impacts to sealife including the albatross. They count and photograph the bottle caps they collect and use the information to share with beverage industry and legislature and work towards solutions like leashing the lid to the bottle.

     

    Decades of data from Coastal Cleanup Day show that plastic bottle caps are the 4th most prevalent item found at cleanups. In the last 26 years, 1,044,414 plastic bottle caps have been collected and recorded. Those that don’t get picked up by volunteers join the plastic soup in the ocean where they are then ingested by many animals, notably the impressive seabird, the Albatross.

     

    It’s time to leash the lid! In the 1970s the pull-tab or “pop top” on aluminum cans was replaced by the much safer and environmentally friendlier “sta-tab”, and is still in use today. We did it then, we can do it again.

     

    In 2009, the Clean Seas Coalition worked with California Assembly Member Lori Saldana  (D-San Diego) to introduce Assembly Bill 925. That bill would have required that all plastic bottle caps on single-use containers be attached to the bottle. Unfortunately, the bill did not make it out of the Senate. At that time, recyclers did not want folks to keep their polypropylene lids on their PETE bottles. Times have changed and now recyclers are able to recycle both the lid and the bottle through the sink/flow mechanism.

     

    The Albatross Coalition picked up the charge and recruited California Assembly Member Mark Stone (D-Santa Cruz) to reintroduce the bill. Assembly Bill 319 would prohibit a retailer, on and after January 1, 2020, from selling or offering for sale a single-use plastic beverage container with a cap that is not tethered to or contiguously affixed to the beverage container.

     

    If successful, this legislation could change bottle packaging design and help save the albatross.


    University of New South Wales, Martina de Marcos

     

    The audience would be organizations, including governmental who would like to implement the plastic gab ban in any community and who can benefit from successes and failures from the Caribbean Island States.

     

    Plastics, including plastic bags, are a significant source of litter, causing harm to animals by ingestion or entanglement. Plastic bags also clog up water drains, causing floods, threatening human. This has led to regulations for single use plastic bags in many countries around the globe, including, in recent years Small Island Developing States (SIDS). The need to stop indiscriminate consumption of single use plastic bags is particularly relevant for Countries of the Wider Caribbean Region (WCR) as the most significant downstream impact of litter in the environment is marine pollution. This region has an abundance of natural assets, with the majority of the population living within 10 kilometers of the ocean and with vital economic sectors dependent on vulnerable coastal ecosystems. In addition, SIDS has poor waste management infrastructure which exacerbates the need of single use plastic reduction. Places where a single use plastic bag ban has been introduced include Aruba, Antigua and Barbuda, Haiti, Puerto Rico, and Rincón, a municipality in Puerto Rico.

     

    This session will present SIDS’ case studies by analyzing approaches for the successful enforcement of the ban. Methods analyzed include: incentives, enforcement, education, capacity building and funding from international agencies. The analysis shows the importance of (i) using a combination of different approaches for successful enforcement, (ii) education and capacity building being pivotal in the realization of the plastic bag ban. Successful education programs led to very little opposition to the ban and big compliance rates; while no education, resulted in the law not being fulfilled. A study from Chubut province in Argentina was included, to show the importance for agencies to support the introduction of regulations, as the program was successfully carried out by the World Bank. Chubut is a small region also dependent on natural tourism.

     

    Given the novelty of the bag ban in SIDS, there are still no peer-reviewed studies on the area, allowing the Conference to deliver a fresh topic that will be very relevant for any international organisms, NGOs and members of the government who want to present single-use plastic bag regulations or other related single use plastic regulations in their communities. They can benefit from the conclusions of this presentation as it will provide a clear guide on how to successfully approach the campaign to regulate the use of plastic bags in small regions and countries.

     

    Martina is part of World Clean Up, an organization that is just starting and whose aim is to educate school children in Latin America and the Caribbean on Marine Litter issues. 


    Plasticbaglaws.org, Jennie Romer, Esq

     

    Ocean advocates and policymakers should be aware of preemption laws developed by conservative state lawmakers, often at the behest of industry lobbyists and formulated by ALEC, that threaten to block to the adoption and implementation of local plastic pollution reduction laws (plastic bag and foam bans).

     

    Preemption of local plastic pollution control ordinances is an effort that is playing out at the state level of government in the U.S. as a way to quash local environmental efforts. These preemption laws generally prohibit municipalities from adopting local ordinances regulating a particular product, namely bans or fees on carryout plastic bags. More and more commonly, these laws apply more broadly by banning all local ordinances regulating “ancillary containers” (bags, expanded polystyrene foam food containers, etc.). Preemption laws infringe upon municipalities’ right to regulate traditionally “local” fields such as the protection of health and safety, including the power to regulate waste, as well as usurping Home Rule.

     

    This issue encompasses not only plastic pollution but also the loss of local power to corporate interests. The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), where corporate lobbyists and state legislators vote as equals on “model bills” that often benefit corporations’ bottom line at public expense, has made preemption part of its new playbook to rein in environmental regulation. The plastics industry (and industry generally) has found that they have more power at the state level and are increasingly focusing legislative efforts on preemption bills in order to block all progress at regulating plastic pollution at the local level. ALEC has developed a model bill specific to banning local regulation of containers and this model is being pursued in several states.

     

    Preemption of regulations relating to plastic bags has been especially prevalent because plastic bag bans have their roots in grassroots activism. As of June 1, 2017, single-use plastic bag ban preemption legislation is currently proposed in Texas and South Carolina. State legislators in Minnesota, Michigan, Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Missouri, Wisconsin, and Iowa have already preempted regulation of plastic bags, and often all manner of containers, and much of the preemption legislation is identical. The statewide usurpation of “Home Rule” is not only happening with bags and foam foodware; there have been attempts to preempt local action on building efficiency rules, fracking, pesticide regulation, medicine take back programs and environment conservation efforts.

     

    Not only must ocean advocates and policymakers keep a strong on-the-ground presence to continue to pass local single-use plastic bag regulations and foam foodware bans, but they also have to ensure that they have a presence and a voice at the statewide level to challenge the industry lobbyists that threaten to silence local voices and action on the topic of marine plastic pollution. To combat preemption, ocean advocates should oppose statewide legislation that takes away the right of municipalities to improve their environment and continue to push for strong statewide legislation, like the recent passage of the California statewide bag ban. Ocean advocates also need to make sure that strongest possible local laws continue to be adopted and that we diligently track the efficacy of local bag bans and fees and demonstrate how these policies effectively change consumer behavior and reduce the amount of single-use plastic pollution in local parks, streets, beaches, and waterways.


    Surfrider Foundation (and Co-Chair of Clean Seas Coalition)

    Angela T. Howe, Esq.

     

    Feature the local battles from the main coastal regions of the U.S. Also talk about statewide and regional collaboration and federal success with the Microbeads bill.

     

    Since 2010, there have been hundreds of local laws, dozens of state laws and a handful of federal bills focused on addressing marine debris in the U.S.  Sometimes these efforts are similar, but in other instances there are important variations in laws that address the same problem.  In California, the number of local bag bans that were disparate in form and coverage led to a greater need for a statewide law and uniformity for grocers and other merchants.

     

    This panel will investigate the different types of local laws that have been passed around the nation, including Maui County's recent polystyrene foam foodware ban, the City of Coral Gables local foam and bag regulations despite allegations of state preemption, and the interplay between local and state law in Massachusetts and Oregon. Finally, the panel will discuss how an initially controversial issue, like plastic microbeads found in personal care products, can be successfully addressed by a bi-partisan effort at the federal level.  Consequently, the U.S. has many laws put into place, at every level of government, to address the growing problem of marine debris and offers great examples of what can by done by various levels of decision-makers.


    Surfrider, Melissa Gates

    Surfrider Foundation, Angela Howe

     

    In this session policy makers, ENGOs, citizens and others will better understand how the efforts of municipalities in Maine and Massachusetts are being leveraged to build support for statewide legislation.  

     

    Municipal bag ban campaigns are trending across New England, building a strong case for bipartisan support of single-use bag legislation at the statewide level. 

     

    Concerned community members, environmental nonprofit organizations, and elected officials are at the forefront of organizing local efforts that are successfully sweeping the region. 

     

    In this session, focus will be applied on the nexus between approaches of various municipal efforts in Maine and Massachusetts, and how those efforts have set the tone and course for statewide policies. We will pull from the expertise of the panelists in fleshing out the case study with tangible, on-the-ground examples while integrating the knowledge and expertise of all session participants in extrapolating lessons learned. Guided by participant-led Q&A with the panel, we will examine strategies for crafting legislation and building strong coalitions that advance good policy while mitigating conflicts via gaining buy-in from critical stakeholder groups. We will address critical policy measures aimed at ensuring compliance with the legislation and its intents, enforcement mechanisms, and other vital components that serve to mitigate plastics in the marine environment while shifting the consumer paradigm away from single- use and into sustainable use.

     

    Participants will leave with a better understanding of how municipal efforts work and build support for statewide legislation, an effort that can be duplicated and applied in other areas to achieve pollution and source reduction goals.

    This session track will address derelict fishing gear governance and innovative approaches.  Topics include the following and more:

     

    • Global Trends and Analysis of Abandoned, Lost or Discarded Fishing Gear
    • Best Practices and Innovative Collaborations to Prevent, Reduce and Remove Abandoned, Lost or Discarded Fishing Gear
    • Outreach and Education Campaigns to Prevent and Reduce Impacts of Lost Fishing Gear; Approaches to Establishing Systematic Removal of Derelict Fishing Gear
    • Local Knowledge to Prevent, Reduce and Remove Abandoned, Lost or Discarded Fishing Gear
    • Circular Economies

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Joanna Toole

    World Animal Protection, Lynn Kavanagh
    Northwest Straits Foundation, Jason Morgan

     

    This session will showcase efforts being made to eliminate the threat of Abandoned, Lost or Discarded Fishing Gear (ALDFG) from the world’s oceans through the development of best practice guidelines and education and outreach with fishing communities.

     

    The Best Practice Framework for the Management of Fishing Gear (BPF) developed by the Global Ghost Gear Initiative (GGGI), launched in 2017 will be presented by World Animal Protection, demonstrating how the cause and impact of ALDFG can be reduced by taking action at different stages of the life-cycle of the gear and with interventions across the seafood supply chain. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) will demonstrate work taking place at the UN level to develop International Guidelines on the Marking of Fishing Gear - one example of best practice, and the implementation of these Guidelines through pilot projects. The Northwest Straits Foundation will provide insights on work that is happening within fishing communities around the world to implement best practice and how this is being achieved through outreach and education campaigns.

     

    Collectively, these organizations will demonstrate the progress being made at different levels with multiple stakeholders that together represent significant progress on this issue. This session will be interactive, providing the audience with an opportunity for learning through the discussion of case studies.


    Natural Resources Consultants, Inc.Joan Drinkwin
    Natural Resources Consultants, Inc. Kyle Antonelis
    NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, Daniel Tonnes

     

    The session will provide an overview of the importance of local ecological knowledge to solve lost fishing gear problems and will include a panel discussion highlighting successful newly lost fishing gear removal programs.

     

    The session will highlight the importance of working with local ecological knowledge to lost fishing gear problems. The session will include speakers detailing research, documentation, prevention and removal of various types of lost fishing gear through the aid of Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) from fishers, divers, researchers, and other stakeholders. LEK is critical to identify areas where fishing gear is lost or may accumulate in marine waters. In general, empirical data records reflecting information about lost fishing gear is rare, even under some of the most sophisticated fishery management regimes. Therefore, LEK is often the only source for initial investigations aimed at understanding the location, quantity, density, and extent of lost fishing gear in a particular region. LEK is also the fastest and most accurate source of information about newly lost fishing gear.

     

    The session will close with a panel discussion featuring successful programs that systematically remove newly lost fishing gear through collaboration with fishers, volunteers, and fisheries managers. This panel will provide examples from a variety of net and trap fisheries of programs involving the fisheries managers and the private sector, including commercial and recreational fishers, designed to locate and remove lost fishing gear on at least an annual basis. The session will cover the regulatory and/or programmatic framework needed to achieve regular removal of lost fishing gear and will cover lessons learned, challenges, costs, and funding.


    Center for Coastal Studies; Univ. of Massachusetts, Mark Borrelli

    Center Coastal Studies, Laura Ludwig

     

    This session is catered to action-oriented people of all disciplines seeking methods to stop the flow of trash from cities to the marine environment now; the scale of the problem and solutions being applied and planned in two very different parts of the world.

     

    The world's oceans are being buried in debris now. We have to stop the bleeding and remove the big pieces of debris before they break down and disperse in our waters as we seek more aggressive preventative measures, or it may be too late. The further marine debris travels into the world's coastal waters and the sea, it becomes more a more difficult and expensive to remove and has more time and opportunity to wreak havoc on the ecosystem and human health. Baltimore, Maryland and Rio de Janeiro are two very different cities that are taking aggressive action to control marine debris with mixed success.

     

    This session will explore the scope of the problem and the solutions that have been and are being tried now to reduce debris entering Chesapeake Bay and Gianabara Bay and ultimately the sea. Efforts in Baltimore are being driven by a unique private sector and public sector partnership. Rio de Janeiro is taking a government focused approach but action is also being driven by a non-profit sector effort that uses the marine environment as a teaching tool to educate and engage students from poor families living in the watershed


    Global Ghost Gear Initiative (GGGI); University of Tasmania, Australia and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Australia Kelsey Richardson

    World Animal Protection, Elizabeth Hogan

     

    This session is designed for an audience interested in learning more about the data and information available surrounding abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG); the session will summarize the work by the Global Ghost Gear Initiative (GGGI)'s Build Evidence Working Group to compile a diverse data collection related to ALDFG and ghost gear from a variety of stakeholders around the world, and ongoing efforts to make this information known and accessible to anyone interested in and engaged with the ALDFG or ghost gear issues.

     

    The Global Ghost Gear Initiative (GGGI) was launched in 2015 to collaboratively address the issue of ghost gear and abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) on local, regional and global scales.  The GGGI is comprised of a diverse variety of participants that include the fishing industry, the private sector including fishing gear manufacturers and the seafood industry, researchers, governments, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations.  The GGGI addresses sea-based sources of marine debris, specifically ALDFG, and contributes to the Global Partnership on Marine Litter. 

     

    The GGGI’s aims are: to improve the health of marine ecosystems; to protect marine animals from harm; and to safeguard human health and livelihoods.  This technical session is focused on communicating the goals, accomplishments and ongoing work by the GGGI’s Build Evidence Working Group (BE WG). 

     

    A focus for the BE WG has been the development of a global database and associated web portal for ALDFG and ghost gear.  The database aims to bring together data that can help to fill knowledge gaps on the sources, locations, amounts, types, fates and impacts of ghost gear around the world.  Data analysis can be used to identify ghost gear “hotspots”, high risk fisheries for gear loss and temporal and spatial trends in ghost gear abundance and type.

     

    The BE WG communicated with more than 100 individuals and organisations from more than 50 countries and territories to identify past, ongoing and planned work and initiatives around the ghost gear issue.  Many of these groups shared their data to help develop the centralised global ghost gear database.  Information collected from groups mostly originates from 5 main areas: 1) Cleanups (coastal and dive), 2) Surveys, 3) Removal/Retrieval projects, 4) data collected by fishing vessels themselves or observers onboard, and 5) data about impacts to animals and wildlife (frequently disentanglement or strandings data).

     

    Another key accomplishment for the BE WG was the development of a global ghost gear ‘app’ whereby a variety of users can input data about found and/or recovered ghost gear and its impacts using a common data reporting form.  This app was designed to collect more information about ghost gear globally as well as to provide a consistent method for data reporting where disparate data types can be compared against one another in a standardised way.

     

    The GGGI’s BE WG also created a centralised information sharing platform that users can visit to search for and find publications and literature about ghost gear, with categories organised by geography, gear types, impacts, fisheries, and year.

     

    This session will benefit the conference by engaging audience members on the global ALDFG issue, a key and distinct part of the global marine debris issue.  Sharing the GGGI’s BE WG’s transboundary data from around the world benefits a range of international stakeholders including the scientific community, policy makers and managers, and those involved with ALDFG removal by advancing information sharing and collaboration on this important topic.


    World Animal Protection / Global Ghost Gear Initiative, Christina Dixon

    Natural Resource Consultants, Joan Drinkwin

     

    International examples for coastal communities and fishing industry stakeholders of how innovative ideas and cross-sectoral collaborations are creating financial and environmental benefits while facilitating the reduction of abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) 

     

    Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG), otherwise known as ‘ghost gear’, is of increasing concern due to its numerous negative impacts.

     

    In a recent study by CSIRO and the Ocean Conservancy into marine litter, derelict fishing gear, including nets, fishing line, traps and buoys were found to pose the greatest overall threat to all types of marine wildlife, largely through entanglement. As fishing gear is purposefully designed to catch animals, the impact on wildlife once lost or abandoned can be catastrophic. Furthermore, the ability of ALDFG to continue to fish (often referred to as “ghost fishing”) has detrimental impacts on fish stocks, coastal livelihoods, endangered species and benthic environments.

     

    In 2015 World Animal Protection launched the Global Ghost Gear Initiative (GGGI) to bring together the seafood sector, governments, civil society and academia to drive sustainable solutions to this issue at a global scale. Many countries at the United Nations have vocally expressed their support for the Global Ghost Gear Initiative and in 2016 the UN General Assembly formally recognized that ‘ghost gear’ has serious and increasingly pervasive economic, social and environmental impacts on the marine eco-system.

     

    Within the GGGI there are three working groups, operating holistically and systematically to build evidence of ALDFG, develop and implement best practices for the management of fishing gear throughout the seafood supply chain and catalyse sustainable solutions.

     

    The GGGI ‘Catalyse and Replicate Solutions Working Group’ brings together global experts who are leading on the development and management of sustainable, replicable solutions to facilitate the removal, reduction and often recycling of ALDFG.

     

    This session aims to move away from a focus on the problem and look at solutions that are working around the world to engage and mobilise the fishing industry, coastal communities, designers and the private sector to think laterally and collaboratively to reduce the abundance of ghost gear in our oceans. The solutions working group speakers on the panel will shine a light on examples of how circular economy thinking and innovation is providing opportunities to practically stem the tide of end of life fishing gear into the sea and transform this waste into a resource.

     

    Represented in the session will be Joel Baziuk from Steveston Harbour Authority, who has been working with the local fishing industry in British Columbia, Canada, to create lasting and systemized recycling projects to keep fishing gear out of the water; Claire Potter, who is leading a project on the south coast of England to explore how ALDFG could be identified, categorised, separated and potentially monetised locally – looking from an inclusive design perspective for circular economy led solutions to create potential new ‘products’; and David Stover, one of the founders of Bureo, a company who combined their expertise in product design and a passion for the oceans and social enterprise to work with a fishing community in Chile and create skateboards from fishing nets. 

     

    The audience will come away with concrete examples of successful solution projects and the start of a toolkit of how the circular economy model can be implemented to reduce the impact of ghost gear in our oceans.


    NOAA Marine Debris Program  Keith Cialino

     

    This session will focus on actionable guidance or findings from research to prevent gear loss and to disable lost gear in order to reduce target species mortality and habitat impacts.

     

    Lost or discarded fishing gear that is no longer under a fisherman’s control becomes known as derelict fishing gear (DFG), and it can continue to trap and kill fish, crustaceans, marine mammals, sea turtles, and seabirds. The most common types of DFG to ghost fish are gillnets and crab pots/traps. Ghost fishing can impose a variety of harmful impacts, including: the ability to kill target and non-target organisms, including endangered and protected species; causing damage to underwater habitats such as coral reefs and benthic fauna; and contributing to marine pollution.

     

    Derelict fishing gear (DFG) can continue to confine and entangle both target and bycatch species with implications for the overall status of these populations. DFG resting on top of or becoming entangled with habitat-forming species leads to physical abrasion and breakage and during high wind events, DFG can move great distances, creating large areas of impact. Although the contribution of abandoned, lost, or otherwise discarded fishing gear to marine debris has long been recognized worldwide, quantitative data are sparse for many regions.

     

    This technical session will highlight research that seeks to prevent gear loss and to disable lost gear. Speakers in this session will highlight actionable guidance or findings from research that could be implemented more broadly through pilot studies or regulatory changes.

     

    Topics of interest include: gear alternatives; gear modifications to prevent loss; gear modifications to disable lost gear; best practices to reduce loss; best practices for engaging with fishermen; rate of loss studies; derelict gear density studies; target species mortality in derelict gear; habitat impacts from derelict gear.

     

    While removal efforts can be discussed, speakers will be asked to explore implementable results from their projects, rather than just the removal methods and amount of derelict gear removed.

    This session track will address case studies from around the world. Topics include the following and more:

     

    • Land Based Strategies (e.g. Vietnam)
    • Marine Debris Networks - Value, Impact and Challenges
    • Cross-Sectoral Collaboration (e.g. solid waste management, container shipping)
    • Innovative Approaches to Trash Removal/Prevention (e.g. Trash Wheel, Behavior Change)

    Ocean Conservancy, Eric DesRoberts

     

    This session will take a deep dive into a case study of waste management opportunities in rural Vietnam and will share insights from NGO, industry, and local government representatives.

     

    Close to 75% of trash in the ocean is dumped directly into the natural environment by households, generally due to inadequate or nonexistent local waste services. While the total volume of marine leakage is highest from urban areas, the proportion of households who dump waste is highest in rural areas, where few, if any, waste services exist.  In Vietnam, over 60% of its population lives in close proximity to waterways and nearly 70% of the population lives in rural areas. Starting in early 2017, Ocean Conservancy worked with The Dow Chemical Company and many organizations in Vietnam to better understand the waste management challenges in rural areas and start to develop potential solutions to address this issue. This session will discuss the key findings of this project, highlight the need for locally appropriate solutions to addressing the entire waste stream, emphasize the benefits of a collaborative approach, and outline the potential to implement and scale solutions specific to rural areas.


    Indonesian Waste Platform, Nina van Toulon

    Freelancer, Jella Kandziora

     

    The creation of marine networks is of utmost importance as they offer a framework to evaluate strategies, share information and join efforts to tackle marine debris and reach Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14.

     

    Marine debris is one of the most challenging problems of the 21st century. Due to its complexity multiple measures are needed at various scales and targeting different audiences worldwide. Stakeholders from all sectors need to collaborate. In order to tackle marine debris national and international networks based on a collective impact approach (CIA) are required. Through this framework it is possible to coordinate work, evaluate strategies, share information, build collaborations between all relevant stakeholders and above all focus their efforts towards the prevention and reduction of marine debris.

     

    The Indonesian Waste Platform, founded in October 2015, is a hub connecting stakeholders from government, industry, academia and grass roots/community initiatives IWP hub shows exemplary how collective impact not only works in practice on national level but could also serve as a global model.

     

    The aim of the session is to present existing marine debris networks (i.e. Indonesian Waste Platform, African Marine Waste Network etc.) and their bottom-up approaches to connect stakeholders from all sectors as well as to promote the forming of a common shared vision, strategy and action plans. At the end of the session the awareness regarding the important role of a marine debris network in the context of reaching SDG 14 shall be increased. Furthermore, possible solutions to challenges like the lack of funding shall be discussed.


    EAP Consult Ltd, Heather Troutman

     

    Policy makers, urban planners, civil society, the private and informal sectors must come together to devise innovative solutions to stop marine debris inputs at source by facilitating comprehensive waste management services to all citizens, especially the urban poor.

     

    The majority of land-based marine debris inputs globally come from developing-economy cities lacking comprehensive waste management services fueled by high rates of informality, lagging infrastructure, insufficient tax-base for municipal services, rapid population growth and projections for sharp economic development. Without access to municipal services, rivers are commonly used to take the waste “away” into our global oceans.  The public, private, civil and informal sectors and the international development community must collaborate to find rapid solutions to extend waste management services in areas that are currently neglected and to those citizens unable to afford the services.  One approach is the establishment of resource recovery and reprocessing enterprises that use waste materials to produce valuable products, therefore creating an economic demand for waste materials.  In the short-term, informal communities can be empowered to collect and sort their own wastes and then sell the materials to manufacturers, creating needed jobs, saving virgin resources and preventing movement of wastes into marine environments.  This strategy has also been used to engage struggling fisher-folk to help remove debris from the marine environment, augmenting their difficult incomes.  Cities and companies around the world have been demonstrating best practices in cross-sectoral partnerships to mobilize the unique resources of different stakeholder groups to rapidly reach a collective aim: a clean urban environment and healthy water bodies.  This technical session will bring together change makers from different sectors and different regions to discuss how the common characteristics shared by developing-economy cities can be used as strategies for socioeconomic development and the provision of sustainable waste management services to all citizens.  Participants will learn about the different perspectives, constraints and resources available to generalized stakeholder groups, and learn strategies to initiate and sustain necessary support.  Panelist will describe the technologies, strategies and financial products and the adaptation process to make them appropriate in their context, and share key insights into their successes and failures in communities around the world.  Waste generation and management is a fundamentally human activity.  Behavioral Insight and Human Centered Design help us understand the human elements of waste management in any specific place, and help us identify strategies that will work specifically in that place at a pace as rapid as the global crises of marine debris demands.  This technical session will create a space for the sharing of best practices and the establishment of partnerships to work with our global citizens to design and implement solutions together for the elimination of land-based marine debris inputs.


    KCI Technologies, Inc, Robert M Summers, Ph.D.

    KCI Technologies, Thomas Sprehe

     

    Action-oriented people of all disciplines seeking methods to stop the flow of trash from cities to the marine environment now; the scale of the problem and solutions being applied and planned in two very different parts of the world.

     

    The world's oceans are being buried in debris now. We have to stop the bleeding and remove the big pieces of debris before they break down and disperse in our waters as we seek more aggressive preventative measures, or it may be too late. The further marine debris travels into the world's coastal waters and the sea, it becomes more an more difficult and expensive to remove and has more time and opportunity to wreak havoc on the ecosystem and human health. Baltimore, Maryland and Rio de Janeiro are two very different cities that are taking aggressive action to control marine debris with mixed success. This session will explore the scope of the problem and the solutions that have been and are being tried now to reduce debris entering Chesapeake Bay and Gianabara Bay and ultimately the sea. Efforts in Baltimore are being driven by a unique private sector and public sector partnership. Rio de Janeiro is taking a government focused approach but action is also being driven by a non-profit sector effort that uses the marine environment as a teaching tool to educate and engage students from poor families living in the watershed.


    Trash Free Maryland, Julie Lawson

    KCI Technologies, Thomas Sprehe

     

    The panel will examine a coordinated system of innovative approaches to behavior change, community engagement, and trash removal that can be applied in cities around the world.

     

    As a post-industrial city with a declining population, Baltimore, Maryland, faces numerous challenges. Development of trash removal regulations (TMDL) for the Inner Harbor in 2014 spurred additional investment in preventing and cleaning up trash pollution in the water, but the blight of litter is also a major community concern, diminishing quality of life and contributing to infrastructure issues.

     

    Through extensive partnership and innovation, the city now has a nearly complete system of interventions to address litter and marine debris through behavior change, community engagement, and technology. The approaches the speakers will present can bring new ideas to cities around the world, incorporating themes of environmental justice, public-private-NGO partnership, and regulation/policy.

     

    Julie Lawson of Trash Free Maryland will examine aspects of the Trash Free Baltimore coordinated campaign to change littering behavior. Through formative research, the project team identified recovery as a key motif to any public-facing campaign, and began a partnership with substance abuse treatment centers and health clinics around the city to develop a clinical protocol connecting litter pickup with rehabilitation from heroin/opioid addiction.

     

    Leanna Wetmore of the Waterfront Partnership’s Healthy Harbor Initiative will share insights about working with residents in highly distressed neighborhoods to rehabilitate alleys and reconnect neighbors to each other through trash cleanup and public art.

     

    Baltimore’s famed Mr. Trash Wheel, and newly installed Professor Trash Wheel, have made a splash on social media and generated significant attention both locally and globally, educating people about trash pollution while removing more than a million pounds of debris from Baltimore’s rivers. Tom Sprehe of KCI, John Kellett of Clearwater Mills, or Adam Lindquist of the Waterfront Partnership will outline how the water wheels came about, their effectiveness in educating the public, and the potential they have in waterways around the world.

     

    The session will conclude with a panel discussion about how the approaches support each other, the public-private-NGO partnerships that made them successful, and what lies ahead.

  • Please submit under the general/other track only if the abstract’s scope of work does not fall in the above 10 tracks.
  • Additional Information

    If you would like to learn more about the Marine Pollution Bulletin, please visit their website here.

Important Dates

Early Registration Opens: Monday, August 28, 2017
Abstract/Poster Submission Deadline: Wednesday, October 11, 2017
Abstract/Poster Notification: Monday, December 4, 2017
Early Registration Ends: Friday, December 15, 2017
Deadline for presenters of accepted abstracts to register: Friday, January 05, 2018
Release Final Program: Monday, January 29, 2018
Conference Begins: Monday, March 12- Friday, March 16, 2018

Expectations

Abstract/poster presenters are not, at this time, allotted any travel funds. The travel award application is on the 6IMDC registration web page. This will be reviewed on a competitive basis. You should be prepared to pay for your travel and attendance (including registration fee) to the conference.

Please visit the 6IMDC website and sign-up to be on our Updates Email List. If you have any questions, please contact [email protected].

Marine debris images credit to NOAA CREP, unless otherwise specified.
Copyright © 2017 Sixth International Marine Debris Conference. All Rights Reserved.

Scroll to top